Description
Acupuncture is a traditional form of Chinese medical treatment that has been practiced for more than 3,000 years.

Acupuncture is the practice of piercing the skin with needles at specific body sites to induce anesthesia, to relieve pain, to alleviate withdrawal symptoms of substance abusers or to treat various non-painful disorders. In acupuncture, the placement of needles into the skin is dictated by the location of meridians. These meridians are thought to mark patterns of energy flow throughout the human body. Acupuncture has four components: the acupuncture needle(s), the target location defined by traditional Chinese medicine, the depth of insertion and the stimulation of the inserted needle. Acupuncture may be performed with or without electrical stimulation.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has cleared acupuncture needles for marketing. The needles used in acupuncture, when intended for general use in "the performance of acupuncture," have been classified by the FDA to Class II devices (The Gray Sheet, April 8, 1996). The order states that "clinical studies and preclinical animal studies constitute valid scientific evidence in support of the clinical effectiveness of acupuncture needles for the performance of acupuncture treatment."

Policy
Acupuncture may be considered MEDICALLY NECESSARY for treatment of nausea associated with surgery, chemotherapy and pregnancy.

Acupuncture for any other indication, including, but not limited to, acupuncture for the treatment of pain, is considered INVESTIGATIONAL.

NOTE: PLEASE SEE SPECIFIC CONTRACT VERBIAGE FOR EXCLUSION, LIMITATIONS AND/OR MAXIMUMS RELATED TO ACUPUNCTURE.

Dry needling is the use of solid filiform needles for therapy of muscle pain, sometimes also known as intramuscular stimulation. It involves the direct insertion of needles into myofascial trigger points to deliver electrical current into the painful area. Dry needling differs from traditional acupuncture in the location of the insertion points and the theories for pain relief. Acupuncture practitioners insert needles according to theories of energy flow, while in dry needling, needles are inserted into the painful areas of trigger points.

Intramuscular stimulation "dry needling" is considered INVESTIGATIONAL. It does not meet the TEC criteria listed below.

The scientific evidence must permit conclusions concerning the effect on health outcomes: Despite the fact that dry needling has been known about for years, there have been few published studies measuring the effect on patient outcomes published in the peer-reviewed literature. Those studies that are available have design flaws or comprise small study samples so that it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding patient outcomes.

1. The technology must improve the net health outcome: No treatment-associated adverse events were reported in these studies. The treatment appears to be safe. Whether net health outcomes are improved, however, has not been established. Authors of systematic reviews have reported that dry needling may be effective, but that the limited number of studies, small sample design and low methodological quality of the studies define a need for further study in this area.
2. The technology must be as effective as any established alternatives: The direct alternative to dry needling is the conventional trigger point injection of lidocaine and/or corticosteroid. The evidence has not established that dry needling is at least as effective, nor does the evidence establish that dry needling when used as an adjunct to other physical modalities results in improved outcomes.
3. The improvement must be attainable outside the investigational setting: The evidence does not permit conclusions regarding improvement in outcomes when the treatment is performed in the investigational settings. The criterion therefore is not met.

Update 2012: A search of the evidence-based literature was performed for the period of September 2009 through December 2011. Findings in the recent literature do not change the conclusion on dry needling. Therefore, the policy statement is unchanged.

Rationale
The following study selection criteria were used in the 1996 TEC Assessment:

• The study included a control group that was given a treatment intended to serve as a placebo control, and was compared with active acupuncture treatment.
• The study selected a clinical sample, not healthy volunteers.

Various control treatments were used in the studies reviewed in the 1996 TEC Assessment. Some performed acupuncture outside the traditional meridians. These studies generally did not find an advantage of acupuncture performed by the prescribed method. Other studies used low- or no-needle insertion, and still others used low stimulation. These studies provided more mixed results, but it was unclear whether studies using better quality methods consistently found active acupuncture to produce better results than control acupuncture.

In November 1997, a National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel (NIHCDP) met to discuss acupuncture. The Consensus Statement² concluded that evidence clearly shows that needle acupuncture is efficacious in treating nausea secondary to surgery or chemotherapy in adults, and probably effective for nausea of pregnancy as well. The document also states that there is evidence of efficacy for postoperative dental pain. The panel made a more equivocal statement that acupuncture "may be useful" in the following conditions: addiction, stroke rehabilitation, headache, menstrual cramps, lateral elbow pain, fibromyalgia, myofascial pain, osteoarthritis, low back pain, carpal tunnel syndrome and asthma. The consensus statement has not been updated and is no longer available on the NIH website.

Policy updates since the 1996 TEC Assessment have followed TEC in that they are based on studies that include a control group that received a placebo treatment and studies that used a clinical sample, not healthy volunteers. The current update is based on a literature search through May 2009. Studies of nontraditional or variants of acupuncture were not considered, nor were studies comparing acupuncture with treatments not considered standard care in the United States.

The Cochrane Library lists 24 Cochrane Reviews on the use of acupuncture for the following conditions: low back pain, idiopathic headache, lateral elbow pain, rheumatoid arthritis, induction of labor, asthma, acute stroke, Bell’s palsy, chronic asthma, depression, dysphagia in acute stroke, epilepsy, glaucoma, insomnia, migraine prophylaxis, neck pain, restless leg syndrome, schizophrenia, shoulder pain, stroke rehabilitation, tension-type headache, irritable bowel syndrome, vascular dementia, assisted conception, chemotherapy-induced nausea or vomiting and smoking cessation. For conditions not represented in Cochrane Reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews were reviewed. RCTs with at least 20 subjects published after the latest Cochrane review or update were also included in this update. With respect to systematic reviews of the literature on acupuncture for pain, reviews limited to a specific type of pain were preferred over those that included a variety of conditions.

Nausea Due to Surgery, Chemotherapy and Labor:
Systematic reviews have been published that confirm the NIHCDP conclusions on nausea due to surgery, chemotherapy and labor. In 1996, Vickers³ identified 33 controlled trials of acupuncture for antiemesis. Four studies found that acupuncture was no more effective than control when performed during anesthesia, while 27 of the other 29 studies found acupuncture to be more effective than control. Higher quality studies also consistently found acupuncture to have an antiemetic effect. A later meta-analysis of postoperative nausea and vomiting⁴ concluded that acupuncture could be offered as an alternative to antiemetic drugs. Later publications have arrived at conflicting conclusions. A randomized study by Streitberger and colleagues of patients with postoperative nausea and vomiting reported that acupuncture provided no additional benefit compared to sham acupuncture.⁵

Pain:
The NIHCDP report concluded that acupuncture may be helpful for the following pain conditions: menstrual cramps, fibromyalgia, myofascial pain, osteoarthritis and carpal tunnel syndrome. Two meta-analyses of acupuncture for chronic pain were cited in the NIHCDP report (6, 7), both of which stated that the evidence did not support conclusions about the efficacy of acupuncture, relative to placebo, for chronic pain. Systematic reviews make the same observation on the use of acupuncture for general chronic pain, ^8,9 knee osteoarthritis,¹⁰ fibromyalgia¹¹ and myofascial pain.¹²

Dental Pain:
Two studies were cited in the NIHCDP report of acupuncture for postoperative dental pain. Sung et al.¹³ included 40 patients assigned to four groups receiving both an analgesic and acupuncture, each in either active or placebo forms. Codeine plus active acupuncture was superior in pain relief to all other conditions, but placebo drug plus active acupuncture did not differ from both placebo conditions. These findings have not been replicated. Lao et al.¹⁴ compared active and placebo acupuncture in 19 subjects, finding longer duration of anesthesia in the active group. These authors published another study on a slightly larger sample,¹⁵ but independent replication of these findings has not been published yet. Machalek-Sauberer et al. (2007) evaluated the impact of auricular electroacupuncture (AE) on pain and analgesic consumption in a placebo-controlled double-blind RCT with 149 patients having third molar tooth extraction under local anesthesia.¹⁶ Patients were randomized to auricular acupuncture with or without electrical stimulation (AE and AA respectively), sham AE or no-needle, and concluded that neither AE nor AA alone reduced pain intensity or analgesic consumption. The available evidence on postoperative dental pain is insufficient to permit conclusions about whether the effects of acupuncture exceed those of placebo.

Fibromyalgia:
In a study of 100 patients with fibromyalgia, Assefi reported no difference in pain scores for patients who received acupuncture compared to those who received various sham acupuncture treatments.¹⁷ In a second, partially blinded, small (N = 51) study in patients with fibromyalgia, investigators found that fatigue and anxiety were the most improved symptoms with treatment, but that activity and physical function levels did not change for acupuncture compared with simulated acupuncture.¹⁸ Given these conflicting results, larger controlled studies are needed to further explore the impact of treatment on various outcomes.

Headache:
In a 2002 Cochrane review, Melchart et al.¹⁹ selected 26 controlled trials of acupuncture for idiopathic headache. Sixteen studies compared active and sham acupuncture. The authors noted that the majority of studies had methodologic and/or reporting flaws. They concluded that the quality and quantity of evidence are not fully convincing.

For its 2009 update of its review of acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis, the Cochrane panel considered RCTs with a post-randomization period of at least eight weeks.²⁰ Of the 18 included trials, 14 compared true acupuncture with a variety of sham interventions. There was considerable variation in the results of single trials, and pooled analyses did not show a statistically significant superiority for true acupuncture for any outcome in any of the time frames reported. In the four trials that compared acupuncture with prophylactic drug treatment, slightly better outcomes and fewer adverse effects were reported for acupuncture. Two trials of low quality comparing acupuncture with relaxation alone or relaxation combined with massage could not be interpreted reliably. The authors found no evidence for an effect of true acupuncture over sham interventions. However, they suggest that "exact point location could be of limited importance."

RCTs with at least eight weeks of follow-up were included in the 2009 Cochrane review of acupuncture for treatment of tension-type headache.²¹ Eleven trials were considered. Six of them included patients who received sham interventions. Overall, these trials found slightly better effects in the patients receiving the true acupuncture; 50 percent of patients who received true acupuncture reported a decrease in the number of headache days of at least 50 percent versus 41 percent of the patients who received sham acupuncture. Outcomes were not reported at all time points in all six studies. Only the largest of the studies (n = 409) demonstrated significant differences in response (at least 50 percent reduction in the number of headaches) and number of headache days in four weeks at the first three time points after randomization (up to eight weeks, five to six months, and > six months with four studies reporting this outcome). A significant difference in headache intensity was found only at five months after randomization (four studies reporting). The authors report that "there was little statistical heterogeneity; however, these analyses have limited power. In the time window three to four months after randomization, the pooled responder rate ratio (main outcome measure) was 1.24 (95 percent confidence interval 1.05 to 1.46; I2 = 0 percent; 50 percent responders in acupuncture groups compared to 41 percent in the sham groups), and the weighted mean difference in headache days per four weeks was 1.92 days (0.72 to 3.15; I2 = 0 percent)." Pooling of data from the three trials reporting on frequency of medication use demonstrated a small significant effect favoring acupuncture over sham intervention. While pooled results of these studies suggest that acupuncture is more effective than sham acupuncture, variation in treatment protocols (e.g., placement of needles, treatment schedules) and outcome measurements suggest caution when interpreting results.

Davis and colleagues at the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs of acupuncture for tension-type headache and reviewed eight trials, of which five were included in the meta-analysis.²² The primary outcome was headache days per month and data were assessed during treatment and at long-term follow-up (20 – 25 weeks). The acupuncture group averaged 8.95 headaches per month during treatment, compared with 10.5 in the sham group and 8.21 per month during follow-up versus 9.54 in the sham group. The authors conclude that acupuncture has limited efficacy for reduction of tension-type headache frequency and note the lack of standardization of acupuncture point selection and treatment course among RCTs.

Lateral Elbow Pain:
Green et al.²³ reviewed the use of acupuncture for lateral elbow pain. Reviewers found four small, randomized trials that had study design flaws. The report concluded that the evidence is insufficient to either support or refute the use of acupuncture for this condition. A study postdating the last update to Cochrane Review on this use of acupuncture was published by Fink et al.²⁴ The study found that, compared with placebo acupuncture, active acupuncture achieved better results in pain and function at two weeks, but only function was still better at two months. The study included only 22 patients and is insufficient to overcome the overall methodologic flaws and inconsistent results of the whole evidence base.

Arm Pain:
Goldman et al. (2008) conducted an RTC comparing the effectiveness of true and sham acupuncture on pain and function in patients with arm pain attributed to repetitive use.²⁵ Eight treatments were given over four weeks, and intensity of pain on a 10-point scale (main outcome), arm symptoms and function and grip strength were measured during and one month after treatment. Arm pain improved in both groups, but improvement was significantly greater in the sham group. The difference disappeared by one month after treatment. True acupuncture patients experienced more side effects, mainly mild pain at time of treatments.

Low Back Pain:
A 1999 Cochrane Review on acupuncture for low back pain was completed by van Tulder et al.²⁶ It included 11 randomized trials, only two of which were of high methodologic quality. The paper concluded that evidence was limited that acupuncture is more effective than placebo. A meta-analysis by Ernst and White²⁷ found that evidence is insufficient to state whether acupuncture is superior to placebo. Two trials appearing since these analyses report conflicting results. Carlsson and Sjolund²⁸ found better outcomes in patients receiving active acupuncture compared with placebo, while Leibing et al.²⁹ found no difference between active and placebo acupuncture. A systematic review published in 2008 included 23 trials and grouped them according to control interventions: no treatment, sham intervention, conventional therapy and acupuncture in addition to conventional therapy.³⁰ The authors concluded that there is moderate evidence that acupuncture is more effective than no treatment and strong evidence of no significant difference between acupuncture and sham acupuncture for short-term pain relief. Results of a recent double-blind RCT with 1,162 patients by Haake et al. are consistent with these observations.³¹ Patients were randomized to acupuncture (n = 387), sham acupuncture (superficial needling at non-acupuncture points; n = 387) or conventional therapy (n = 388). Primary outcome was response after six months defined as 33 percent or more improvement on three pain-related items on the Von Korff Chronic Pain Grade Scale or 12 percent or better improvement on the back-specific Hanover Functional Ability Questionnaire. Patients who were unblinded or who used concomitant therapies were counted as nonresponders. At six months, response rate was 47.6 percent in the acupuncture group, 44.2 percent in the sham acupuncture group and 10.3 percent in the conventional therapy group.

Neck Disorders:
A 2006 Cochrane Review focused on acupuncture for chronic (> 3 months) neck disorders.³² While the review concluded that there was moderate evidence to support the use of acupuncture in these patients, the data to support this indication seem limited. Because the total review involved only 661 participants, because there were methodological concerns with most studies and because outcomes for this chronic condition were just measured at the end of treatment, additional studies are needed. Witt and colleagues reported on use of acupuncture for patients with chronic neck pain.³³ While improvement was seen compared to the control group receiving usual care, the lack of a sham acupuncture comparison group raises questions about these results.

Osteoarthritis:
Berman and colleagues reported on a study of 570 patients with osteoarthritis.³⁴ Patients were randomized to receive a 26-week course of gradually tapering true acupuncture or the same schedule of sham acupuncture. An additional group received educational sessions, consisting of two six-hour group sessions. The primary outcome measures were WOMAC pain and function scores at eight and 26 weeks. On follow-up, those in the true acupuncture group experienced greater improvement in WOMAC function scores at eight weeks compared to the sham group, but pain score was only significantly better at 14 and 26 weeks. However, the major limitation in this study was the large number of dropouts: 25.3 percent for true acupuncture, 23.0 percent for sham acupuncture and 37.9 percent for the education group. The Technology Evaluation Center, in applying study quality criteria developed by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, considers any study with a > 20 percent dropout rate to be of "poor" quality. In addition, the published study does not provide adequate detail to determine the impact of the missing data on the reported outcomes. The authors state that they performed a multiple data imputation analysis using five randomly drawn imputations. The details of this process are not described, but the authors conclude that the results of the multiple imputation analysis were very similar to those that used nonimputed data. A more informative approach would be to perform sensitivity analyses using different assumptions about the missing data. For example, a rigorous test of sensitivity would be to assume that all the dropouts in the active treatment group were failures, while all the dropouts in the control groups were successes.

Vas and colleagues reported on the results of a trial that randomized 97 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee to receive either acupuncture or placebo acupuncture with diclofenac.³⁵ Patients were treated for 12 weeks, when the final assessment was made. A total of nine patients dropped out of the study. The primary outcome measure was changes in the WOMAC index and pain levels, using an intent-to-treat analysis, assigning the one dropout in the treatment group the worst score for the treatment group as a whole, while the eight dropouts in the control group were assigned the best scores for the control group. There was a greater reduction in the WOMAC index in the treatment group compared to the control (mean difference between the two groups = 23.9 percent). The study is limited, in that there was no attempt to determine the success of the blinding and the short-term follow-up of 12 weeks.

Scharf and colleagues found that compared with physiotherapy and as-needed anti-inflammatory drugs, the addition of traditional Chinese acupuncture (TCA) or sham acupuncture (10 to 15 treatments) to the conservative regimen led to greater improvement in WOMAC scores at 26 weeks among 1,007 patients with chronic osteoarthritis of the knee.³⁶ Approximately one half of the two "acupuncture" groups had at least a 36 percent improvement in their WOMAC score. No statistically significant difference was observed between TCA and sham acupuncture groups. In contrast, Witt and colleagues found that acupuncture (12 treatments over eight weeks) was superior to both sham acupuncture and no treatment when measured at eight weeks in a group of 294 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.³⁷ At 52 weeks, the difference between acupuncture and sham acupuncture was not statistically significant.

Jubb and colleagues (2008) randomized 68 patients with symptomatic and radiological evidence of osteoarthritis of the knee to acupuncture or non-penetrating sham acupuncture using a sheathed needle.³⁸ Both manual and electrical stimulation were used. The primary outcome measure was change in WOMAC pain score of osteoarthritis of the knee after the course of treatment. Other measures were self-reported pain scale, the EuroQol score and plasma beta-endorphin. The mean between group difference on WOMAC score was 60 (p = .035) in favor of acupuncture, and improvement in pain was significant in the acupuncture group, but not in the sham group (baseline 294, mean change 95 vs. baseline 261, mean change 35, p = .12). Between-group differences were not seen on other measures. One month after treatment, the between-group difference was lost, although the acupuncture group continued to benefit compared to baseline. Of the acupuncture patients, 41 percent correctly guessed their treatment group versus 44 percent in the control group. Plasma beta-endorphin levels were not affected in either group.

A large multicenter RCT including 352 patients with osteoarthritis at 37 centers was conducted in the United Kingdom and published in 2007.³⁹ Patients were randomized to advice and exercise with true or sham acupuncture, or to advice and exercise alone. The primary outcome was change in WOMAC score at six months. Between-group differences were non-significant at all time points, up to and including six months. The authors observe that small benefits in pain intensity and unpleasantness in both acupuncture groups observed make it unlikely that this was due to acupuncture needling effects.

Pelvic Girdle Pain:
A double-blinded RCT (2008) evaluating acupuncture for treatment of pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain was conducted in Sweden.⁴⁰ A total of 115 women with a diagnosis of PGP who scored at least 50 on a visual analogue scale (VAS) were randomized to standard treatment plus acupuncture or standard treatment plus non-penetrating sham acupuncture for eight weeks. The main outcome was pain, and secondary outcomes were frequency of sick leave, functional status, discomfort of pelvic girdle pain, health-related quality of life and recovery from severity of pelvic girdle pain as assessed by the independent examiner. After treatment, median pain score on VAS decreased from 66 to 36 in the acupuncture group and from 69 to 41 in the sham treatment group. Differences in sick leave were not significant. The acupuncture group was more able to perform daily activities (44 vs. 55 on disability index, p = .001). There were no significant differences in quality of life, discomfort of pelvic girdle pain and recovery from severity of pelvic girdle pain between groups. The authors state that "the data imply that needle penetration contributes to a limited extent to the previously reported beneficial effects of acupuncture."

Lupus Erythematosus
In a 2008 paper, Greco et al. report on a pilot study of acupuncture to reduce pain and fatigue associated with systemic lupus erythematosus.⁴¹ Twenty-four patients were randomized to receive 10 sessions of either acupuncture, minimal needling or usual care. Of the 22 patients who completed the study, 40 percent of the acupuncture or minimal needling had >/= 30 percent improvement in pain, with similar results in acupuncture and minimal needling groups. No usual-care patients showed improvement in pain.

Postoperative Pain:
In 2008, Usichenko et al. performed a systematic review of controlled trials to evaluate the evidence of efficacy of auricular acupuncture for postoperative pain control.⁴² Nine RCTs were included in the review. Study quality was evaluated using the Jadad scale, with seven RCTs scoring three or more points but none reaching the maximum of five points. Pain intensity and analgesic requirements were considered the primary outcome measures. Heterogeneity of the studies precluded meta-analysis. Auricular acupuncture was superior to control conditions in eight trials. The authors conclude that the evidence that auricular acupuncture reduces postoperative pain is promising but not compelling.

Usichenko and colleagues (2008) randomized 120 patients undergoing ambulatory arthroscopic knee surgery under general anesthetic to receive either auricular acupuncture (n = 61) or a control procedure (n = 59). Indwelling needles were placed before surgery and fixed with tape.⁴³ Needles were placed at nonacupuncture points in the control group patients. Boluses of piritramide, an opioid agonist, were administered in the recovery room to keep patients’ reported pain intensity at < 40 mm on 100 mm VAS. Patients were encouraged to stimulate the needles every time they experienced more pain than on discharge from the recovery room and instructed to take single doses of ibuprofen, 200 mg, at intervals of at least one hour up to a maximum of 1,400 mg until the follow-up examination. If the patient still had more pain than on discharge, tramadol at one-hour intervals to a total of 200 mg was allowed. All needles were removed the morning after surgery, and tablet counts were reported by the patient. Pain scores were not significantly different between groups after surgery, on discharge from recovery room or the morning after surgery. Acupuncture patients, however, reported requiring less ibuprofen to achieve a VAS score of < 40 (mean 200 mg, range 0 – 600) than the control patients (mean 600 mg, range [200 – 800] [p = .012]). There were no significant differences on other outcome measures, including the number of patients needing tramadol, piritramide dose, discharge time from recovery room, hours of sleep the night after surgery, the number of night arousals after surgery, nausea or vomiting.

Tsang et al. (2007) compared effects of acupuncture with sham acupuncture when added to standard postoperative physiotherapy, on knee pain, range of motion and ambulation in patients undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty.⁴⁴ Thirty-six patients were recruited, and 30 were included in the final analysis, three having dropped out of each group. Primary outcomes were pain on numeric pain rating scale at rest and at maximum after exercise. Beginning on postoperative day four, acupuncture and sham acupuncture were provided by three physiotherapists who held diplomas in acupuncture, who had two to three years of experience in acupuncture and who did not participate in the postoperative therapy. The Chinese version of an 11-point numeric pain rating scale was used to measure average pain level in both legs at rest before the start of acupuncture and the exercise program and pain that was maximally experienced during exercise on postoperative days 4 – 8 and 11 – 15. Active and passive range of motion was measured using a goniometer, and ambulation was assessed by timed up-and-go test on days four, eight and 15. Analgesic usage was recorded daily to day 15. Overall averages (SD) of mean pain scores were 2.2 (1.4) and 2.6 (1.2) at rest, and 6.5 (1.5) and 5.7 (1.7) at maximum from day four to 15 in the acupuncture group and sham group, respectively. No significant differences in overall averages of mean pain scores at rest (p = .43) and at maximum (p = .177) were found. The mean number of analgesic tablets consumed (SD) was 28.3 (11.6) in the acupuncture group and 24.7 (13.8) in the sham group (p = .447). There were no significant differences in active and passive ranges of motion and timed up-and-go test. The success of blinding and patients’ expectations regarding benefit from acupuncture were not assessed in this study.

Rheumatoid Arthritis:
Casimiro et al. performed the 2002 Cochrane Review on acupuncture for rheumatoid arthritis.⁴⁵ Only two controlled trials were found, using different acupuncture methods. One study found acupuncture no more effective than placebo, while the other reported an advantage in knee pain for acupuncture at 24 hours. A 2008 systematic review of acupuncture for pain relief in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by Wang et al. found four active-controlled and four placebo-controlled RCTs that met criteria for review (using Jadad score) and, although there were some favorable results in active-controlled trials, conflicting results were seen in placebo-controlled trials, suggesting that rigorous, well-controlled RCTs are required.⁴⁶ In another 2008 systematic review including seven RCTS, Lee et al. concluded that penetrating or non-penetrating sham-controlled RCTs failed to show specific effects of acupuncture for pain control in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.⁴⁷ A pilot RCT with 40 patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared acupuncture or superficial acupuncture at non-acupuncture points.⁴⁸ The primary endpoint was a 20 percent improvement on the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 criteria after five and 10 treatments and after one month of follow-up. There was not a significant difference in the number of patients reaching ACR20 at the end of treatment (p = .479). However, after one month of follow-up, there was a trend in favor the acupuncture group.

Acupuncture for conditions other than nausea, vomiting and pain

Allergic Rhinitis:
Roberts et al. published a systematic review of acupuncture for allergic rhinitis in 2008 and found seven relevant RCTs. All but two trials were of poor quality, as assessed by a modified Jadad scale. A meta-analysis failed to show any summary benefits of acupuncture for symptom severity scores or serum immunoglobulin E measures that could not be accounted for by chance alone. The authors conclude that the evidence is insufficient to support or refute the use of acupuncture for these patients.⁴⁹ Xue et al. investigated the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in persistent allergic rhinitis in a single-blind RCT with 80 patients randomized to true or sham acupuncture given twice weekly for eight weeks and followed for 12 more weeks.⁵⁰ Outcome measures were nasal obstruction, sneezing, rhinorrhea and nasal itch, each on a five-point scale logged daily by the patients. Scores were aggregated weekly, and the sum of symptom scores (total nasal symptom score [TNSS]) was determined. Use of relief medication was a secondary outcome. After eight weeks of treatment, the weekly mean difference in TNSS from baseline was greater with real (-17.2; 95 percent CI, -24.6 to -9.8) than with sham acupuncture (-4.2; 95 percent CI, -11.0 to 2.7) (P = .01), and the decrease in individual symptom score was also greater with real acupuncture for rhinorrhea (P < .01) but not the other symptoms. The difference in TNSS from baseline in the real acupuncture group was still apparent: real, -21.0 (95 percent CI, -29.1 to -12.9) versus sham, - 2.3 (95 percent CI, -10.2 to 5.6) (P = .001) at the end of follow-up. The differences from baseline in all four individual symptom scores were greater for the real than for the sham acupuncture (P < .05). Fifteen of 42 in the true acupuncture group and 15 of 38 in the sham group dropped out before the end of the study. However, though not stated, it appears that intention-to-treat analysis was applied. The mean difference in relief medication scores between real and sham groups from baseline was not significant either at the end of treatment (real: -3.2; 95 percent CI, -4.9 to -1.5; sham: -0.8; 95 percent CI, -2.6 to 1.0; t = -1.96, P = .053), or at the end of the 12-week follow-up (real: -2.6; 95 percent CI, -4.8 to -0.4; sham: 0.3; 95 percent CI, -2.4 to 3.1; t = -1.69, P = .09). However, within-group comparisons of relief medication scores revealed a significant decline in the use of medication in the real acupuncture group between baseline (7.2; 95 percent CI, 4.8 – 9.7) and week eight of treatment (4.1; 95 percent CI, 2.2 – 5.9; P = .001), and the reduction was still apparent at the end of follow-up (4.6; 95 percent CI, 2.6 – 6.7; P = .02). There was no such reduction in use of relief medication in the sham group: baseline, 4.4 (95 percent CI, 1.9 – 6.9); week 8, 3.6 (95 percent CI, 1.9 – 5.4; P = .40); and week 20 follow-up, 4.7 (95 percent CI, 2.4 – 7.1; P = .80). This may have been explained by non-significant between-group differences at baseline.

Chronic Asthma:
Linde et al.⁵¹ reviewed use of acupuncture for chronic asthma in a 2002 Cochrane Review. Study selection criteria were met by seven trials. The reviewers concluded that no statistically significant or clinically relevant effects have been found in comparisons of active and sham acupuncture. They stated further that evidence is insufficient to make recommendations about the value of acupuncture in asthma treatment. The literature search identified two randomized trials published since the most recent update to the Cochrane Review. Both studies found that active acupuncture did not differ from placebo acupuncture.^52,53 The Cochrane website indicates that the review was assessed as up-to-date in August 2008.

Epilepsy:
A 2006 Cochrane Review of use of acupuncture in patients with epilepsy found only three small randomized trials of varying methodological quality and short follow-up.⁵⁴ The authors concluded that current evidence does not support acupuncture as a treatment for epilepsy. A 2008 update considered 11 trials all from non-U.S. centers.⁵⁵ All had methodological weaknesses, including small sample size and short follow-up, and the panel again concluded that the current evidence does not support acupuncture as a treatment for epilepsy.

Reproduction:
Most of the recent literature on the role of acupuncture in treatment of infertility focuses on its use as an adjuvant to conventional in vitro fertilization procedures. A 2008 Cochrane review was conducted to determine the impact of acupuncture on the outcomes of assisted reproductive treatment (ART).⁵⁶ RCTs comparing acupuncture alone or acupuncture with concurrent ART versus no treatment, placebo or sham acupuncture plus ART for treatment of primary and secondary infertility were selected. Thirteen trials were included in the review. Outcome measures were live birth rate, clinical ongoing pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate and any reported side effects of treatment. There was considerable heterogeneity among the trials in terms of type of sham control used and placement of needles. Meta-analysis suggested a benefit on live birth rate when performed on the day of embryo transfer (odds ratio 1.89, 95 percent CI 0.93 to 3.44). However, the authors conclude that "with the present evidence, this could be attributed to placebo effect and the small number of women included in the trials." There was no evidence of benefit on pregnancy outcomes when acupuncture was performed around the time of oocyte retrieval. The authors caution that "studies in this area should focus on the use of standardised acupuncture methods so that reasonable comparisons can be made; live birth rate should be used as the primary outcome; and the use of ’placebo needles’ can enhance the quality of the studies performed." They advise against use of acupuncture in the luteal phase "until further evidence is available from properly powered RCTs concerning the possible associations between luteal phase acupuncture and miscarriage."

El-Toukhy and colleagues (2008) performed a systematic review of 13 trials in which a total of 2,500 woman undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF)-intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment were randomized to acupunctureor sham acupuncture.⁵⁷ Meta-analysis of five trials (n = 877) of in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome when acupuncture was performed around the time of transvaginal oocyte retrieval and eight trials (n = 1,623) of IVF outcome when it was performed around the time of embryo transfer, demonstrated no difference in clinical pregnancy rates. Five trials of acupuncture around the time of embryo transfer provided live birth data. Meta-analysis did not show a significant increase in live birth rate with acupuncture.

In a third 2008 meta-analysis, Manheimer et al. included seven trials with 1,366 women and obtained data from authors that was not published in the original articles (such as live births).⁵⁸ Their analysis found that acupuncture provided within one day of embryo transfer was associated with significant and clinically relevant improvements in clinical pregnancy (odds ratio 1.65, 95 percent confidence interval 1.27 – 2.14; seven trials), ongoing pregnancy (1.87, 1.40 to 2.49, five trials) and live birth (1.91, 1.39 to 264; four trials). A prespecified subgroup analysis restricted to the three trials with the higher rates of clinical pregnancy in the control group suggested a smaller non-significant benefit of acupuncture (odds ratio 1.24 to 0.86 to 1.77). The authors conclude that these data provide preliminary evidence that acupuncture with embryo transfer improves rates of pregnancy and live births in women undergoing in vitro fertilization.

The effects of acupuncture on uterine and ovarian blood flow, endocrine and metabolic disturbances and sperm count and motility have also been studied. A 2008 systematic review by Ng et al. notes that there are not enough RCTs to validate that acupuncture can help restore ovulation in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome, and that there is insufficient evidence supporting the role of acupuncture in male subfertility, as most studies are case reports and case series with small sample sizes.⁵⁹ Dieterle and colleagues have since reported a single-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 57 men with sperm concentrations < 1 million sperm/ml.⁶⁰ Patients received treatments twice weekly for six weeks. The control group received non-penetrating acupuncture. Five patients dropped out, leaving 24 in the acupuncture group and 28 controls. Semen volumes and sperm concentrations and motility were assessed after liquefaction at five months, </= 5 months and < 3 months before intervention; < 2 months and </= 3 months after intervention. Motility was categorized by World Health Organization categories, e.g., A = rapid linear progressive, B = slow or nonlinear progressive, C = nonprogressive and D = immotile. The primary outcome measure was sperm motility, and secondary outcomes were sperm concentration and semen volume before and after acupuncture. There was a significant effect of acupuncture on the percentage of total motile sperm (motility A-C before acupuncture: 24.2 +17.0 before vs. 33.8 + 18.2 after, p = .35 percent), but no significant differences in each category before and after acupuncture. There were no significant differences in motility in the placebo group before and after treatment. There was a significant decrease in sperm concentration after acupuncture (4.2 ml before and 3.7 ml after, p = .041) and a significant increase in sperm concentration after placebo acupuncture but not after acupuncture (0.016 + 0.085 million/ml before and 0.468 + 1.712 million/ml, p = .0180) for placebo. More evidence is required before the effectiveness of acupuncture in male infertility can be evaluated.

Induction of Labor:
A 2001 Cochrane Review on acupuncture for the induction of labor conducted by Smith and Crowther found no randomized trials meeting study quality standards comparing acupuncture with placebo, no treatment or alternative treatments.⁶¹ The review remained up to date as of Jan. 1, 2008. Crowther, Smith and others published an RCT in late 2008 comparing two sessions of either acupuncture or sham acupuncture two days before planned induction in 364 women with singleton pregnancy and cephalic presentation.⁶² Outcomes measured were the need for induction methods and time from administration of the intervention to delivery. There were no differences between groups on need for induction methods. Median time from acupuncture to delivery was 68.6 hours in the acupuncture group versus 65 hours in the sham treatment group.

Hot Flashes:
Avis et al. (2008) randomized 56 peri- and postmenopausal women who reported having at least four hot flashes per day to receive usual care, twice-weekly sham acupuncture or traditional acupuncture twice weekly for eight weeks.⁶³ All groups experienced a significant decrease in mean frequency of hot flashes between weeks one and eight (p = .01). The two acupuncture groups showed a greater improvement than the usual-care group (p = .05) but did not differ from each other. There were no significant effects for changes in hot flash interference, sleep, mood, health-related quality of life or psychological well-being. The authors conclude that either there is a strong placebo effect or that both traditional and sham acupuncture significantly reduce hot-flash frequency. In another RCT (2007), 72 women with breast cancer and at least three hot flashes per day were assigned to true or sham acupuncture treatments twice weekly for weeks and got flash frequency measured at baseline, six weeks and six months after initiation of treatment.⁶⁴ Hot-flash frequency was reduced in both groups, but not significantly, and the between-group difference was not statistically significant.

Smoking Cessation:
Acupuncture for smoking cessation was reviewed by White et al. in 2002.⁶⁵ The authors found 22 randomized trials. Of these, none found active acupuncture to be superior to placebo acupuncture at any time interval. An RCT of 131 patients was reported by Wu in 2007.⁶⁶ Patients were randomized to eight weeks of auricular acupuncture in Shen Men, Sympathetic, Mouth and Lung points or sham acupuncture and followed up for six more months. At the end of treatment, cigarette consumption had decreased significantly in both groups, but only the treatment group showed a significant decrease in withdrawal symptom score. There was no significant difference in smoking cessation rate between groups at the end of treatment or at the end of follow-up.

Other Addictions:
The NIHCDP report cites three studies on addictions other than tobacco. One study published initial pilot results and six-month follow-up for a comparison of active and sham acupuncture in 80 severe recidivist alcoholics.^67,68 Control patients had higher rates of drinking episodes and admissions to detoxification centers than patients treated with active acupuncture. This was a single-blind study that has not been replicated. A study of 321 patients entered in an outpatient substance abuse program was cited in the NIHCDP report, but it did not include a placebo acupuncture group⁶⁹. A study of cocaine dependence also had no placebo acupuncture group.⁷⁰ A study comparing active and sham acupuncture for both inpatient and outpatient treatment of cocaine abuse failed to find significant effects favoring active acupuncture.⁷¹

Stroke Rehabilitation:
The NIHCDP report cited only one study comparing active and sham acupuncture for stroke rehabilitation.⁷² Response to active treatment was rated as good in four of 10 patients, compared with zero of six placebo group patients. A study by Johansson et al.⁷³ compared acupuncture with low-intensity control electrostimulation and found no significant effects favoring acupuncture in functional outcome or quality of life. A 2006 Cochrane Review was to assess the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for patients with stroke in the subacute or chronic stages.⁷⁴ Five randomized clinical trials were found through November 2005. However, the methodological quality was considered inadequate in all. The authors concluded that there is currently no clear evidence on the effects of acupuncture on subacute or chronic stroke. The Cochrane panel published a review in 2008 of acupuncture for dysphagia in acute stroke and concluded that there is insufficient evidence to draw any conclusion about a therapeutic effect for this indication.⁷⁵ Hopwood et al. (2008) investigated the efficacy of acupuncture versus placebo (mock transcutaneous electrical stimulation) on stroke recovery in 92 patients.⁷⁶ The primary outcome was the Barthel Index (activities of daily living, bowel and bladder function), and secondary outcomes were Motricity Index, mood, Nottingham Health Profile and treatment credibility. There were no significant differences between the two interventions at 12 and 52 weeks, but an apparently accelerated improvement in Motricity Index at three weeks in the acupuncture group.

The Cochrane panel has also published reviews on acupuncture for Bell’s palsy (2006), glaucoma (2007), insomnia (2007), restless leg syndrome (2008) and vascular dementia (2007).^{77,78,79,80,81} In all of these, either no support for the use of acupuncture was found or the lack of high-quality clinical evidence prevented drawing conclusions about its efficacy. Other systematic reviews, all published since 2007, of acupuncture for lowering blood pressure, treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, Parkinson’s disease, treatment of dysmenorrhea and chemotherapy-induced leukopenia found that most studies were of low methodological quality and concluded that the evidence was inconclusive.^{82,83,84,85,86} A systematic review of eight trials of acupuncture for depression concludes that the treatment can reduce the severity of depression, but acknowledges the low quality of the studies.⁸⁷ Small pilot studies of acupuncture for patients with diabetes and symptoms of gastroparesis have also been published.

In summary, the available evidence indicates that acupuncture can reduce nausea and vomiting associated with surgery, chemotherapy and pregnancy. Its use as a complementary treatment in the setting of currently available drug therapies, however, is not clear.⁸⁸ There is limited evidence that acupuncture provides a modest benefit in the treatment of pain associated with osteoarthritis and headache and for improving pregnancy rates in assisted reproductive treatment. The studies do not address patient characteristics that identify patients who may benefit from acupuncture. Heterogeneity of treatment protocols and the variety of sham acupuncture treatments used in studies prevent pooling data with confidence. The absence of a plausible mechanism of action for acupuncture and questions about the significance of placement of needles raised by repeated observations of similar outcomes from true and sham acupuncture treatment also make interpretation of studies difficult.

Technology Assessments, Guidelines and Position Statements

National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel:
A 1997 Consensus Statement concluded that evidence clearly shows that needle acupuncture is efficacious in treating nausea secondary to surgery or chemotherapy in adults, and probably effective for nausea of pregnancy, as well. The document also states that there is evidence of efficacy for postoperative dental pain. The Panel made a more equivocal statement that acupuncture "may be useful" in the following conditions: addiction, stroke rehabilitation, headache, menstrual cramps, lateral elbow pain, fibromyalgia, myofascial pain, osteoarthritis, low back pain, carpal tunnel syndrome and asthma.

References

1. 1996 TEC Assessments; Tab 22.
2. National Institutes of Health. Acupuncture. NIH Consensus Statement 1997; 15(5):1-34.
3. Vickers AJ. Can acupuncture have specific effects on health? A systematic review of acupuncture antiemesis trials. J R Soc Med 1996; 89(6):303-11.
4. Lee A, Done ML. The use of nonpharmacologic techniques to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 1999; 88(6):1362-9.
5. Streitberger K, Diefenbacher M, Bauer A et al. Acupuncture compared to placebo-acupuncture for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis: a randomised placebo-controlled patient and observer blind trial. Anesthesia 2004; 59(2):142-9.
6. ter Riet G, Kleijnen J, Knipschild P. Acupuncture and chronic pain: a criteria-based meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43(11):1191-9.
7. Patel M, Gutzwiller F, Paccaud F et al. A meta-analysis of acupuncture for chronic pain. Int J Epidemiol 1989; 18(4):900-6.
8. Ezzo J, Berman B, Hadhazy VA et al. Is acupuncture effective for the treatment of chronic pain? A systematic review. Pain 2000; 86(3):217-25.
9. Madsen MV, Gotzsche PC, Hrobjartsson A. Acupuncture treatment for pain: systematic review of randomized clinical trials with acupuncture, placebo acupuncture, and no acupuncture groups. BMJ 2009; 338:a3115.
10. Ezzo J, Hadhazy V, Birch S et al. Acupuncture for osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44(4):819-25.
11. Berman BM, Ezzo J, Hadhazy V et al. Is acupuncture effective in the treatment of fibromyalgia? J Fam Pract 1999; 48(3):213-8.
12. Cummings TM, White AR. Needling therapies in the management of myofascial trigger point pain: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82(7):986-92.
13. Sung YF, Kutner, MH, Cerine FC et al. Comparison of the effects of acupuncture and codeine on postoperative dental pain. Anesth Analg 1977; 56(4):473-8.
14. Lao L, Bergman S, Langenberg P et al. Efficacy of Chinese acupuncture on postoperative oral surgery pain. Oral Surg Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995; 79(4):423-8.
15. Lao L, Bergman S, Hamilton GR et al. Evaluation of acupuncture for pain control after oral surgery: a placebo-controlled trial. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 125(5):567-72.
16. Michalek-Sauberer A, Heinzl H, Sator-Katzenschlager SM et al. Perioperative auricular electroacupuncture has no effect on pain and analgesic consumption after third molar tooth extraction. Anesth Analg 2007; 104(3):542-7.
17. Assefi NP, Sherman KJ, Jacobsen C et al. A randomized clinical trial of acupuncture compared with sham acupuncture in fibromyalgia. Ann Intern Med 2005;143(1):10-9.
18. Martin DP, Sletten CD, Williams BA et al. Improvement in fibromyalgia symptoms with acupuncture: results of a randomized controlled trial. Mayo Clin Proc 2006; 81(6):749-57.
19. Melchart D, Linde K, Fischer P et al. Acupuncture for idiopathic headache (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2002. Oxford: Update Software.
20. Linde K, Allais G, Brinkhaus B et al. Acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (1):CD001218.
21. Linde K, Allais G, Brinkhaus B et al. Acupuncture for tension-type headache. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (1):CD007587.
22. Davis MA, Kononowech RW, Rolin SA et al. Acupuncture for tension-type headache: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. J Pain 2008; 9(8):667-77.
23. Green S, Buchbinder R, Barnsley L et al. Acupuncture for lateral elbow pain (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2002. Oxford: Update Software.
24. Fink M, Wolkenstein E, Karst M et al. Acupuncture in chronic epicondylitis: a randomized controlled trial. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2002; 41(2):205-9.
25. Goldman RH, Stason WB, Park SK et al. Acupuncture for treatment of persistent arm pain due to repetitive use: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin J Pain 2008; 24(3):211-8.
26. van Tulder MW, Cherkin DC, Berman B et al. Acupuncture for low back pain (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2002. Oxford: Update Software.
27. Ernst E, White AR. Acupuncture for back pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158(20):2235-41.
28. Carlsson CP, Sjolund BH. Acupuncture for chronic low back pain: a randomized placebo-controlled study with long-term follow-up. Clin J Pain 2001; 17(4):296-305
29. Leibing E, Leonhardt U, Koster G et al. Acupuncture treatment of chronic low-back pain -- a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial with 9-month follow-up. Pain 2002; 96(1-2):189-96.
30. Yuan J, Purepong N, Kerr DP et al. Effectiveness of acupuncture for low back pain; a systematic review. Spine 2008; 33(23):E887-900.
31. Haake M, Muller HH, Schade-Brittinger C et al. German Acupuncture Trials (GERAC) for chronic low back pain: randomized, multicenter, blinded, parallel-group trial with three groups. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167(17)1892-8.
32. Trinh KV, Graham N, Gross AR et al. Acupuncture for neck disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (3):CD004870.
33. Witt CM, Jena S, Brinkhaus B et al. Acupuncture for patients with chronic neck pain. Pain 2006; 125(1-2):98-106.
34. Berman BM, Lao L, Langenberg P et al. Effectiveness of acupuncture as adjunctive therapy in osteoarthritis of the knee. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141(12):901-10.
35. Vas J, Mendez C, Perea-Milla P et al. Acupuncture as a complementary therapy to the pharmacological treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2004; 329(7476):1216-19.
36. Scharf HP, Mansmann U, Streitberger K et al. Acupuncture and knee osteoarthritis: a three-armed randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145(1):12-20.
37. Witt C, Brinkhaus B, Jena S et al. Acupuncture in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomised trial. Lancet 2005; 366(9480):136-43.
38. Jubb RW, Tukmachi ES, Jones PW et al. A blinded randomized trial of acupuncture (manual and electoacupuncture) compared with a non-penetrating sham for the symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knee. Acupunct Med 2008; 26(2):69-78.
39. Foster NE, Thomas E, Barlas P et al. Acupuncture as an adjunct to exercise based physiotherapy for osteoarthritis of the knee: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2007; 335(7617);436.
40. Elden H, Fagevik-Olsen M, Ostgaard HC et al. Acupuncture as an adjunct to standard treatment for pelvic girdle pain in pregnant women: randomised double-blinded controlled trial comparing acupuncture with non-penetrating sham acupuncture. BJOG 2008; 115(13):1655-68.
41. Greco CM, Kao AH, Maksimowicz-McKinnon K et al. Acupuncture for systemic lupus erythematosus: a pilot RCT feasibility and safety study. Lupus 2008; 17(12):1108-16.
42. Usichenko TI, Lehmann CH, Ernst E. Auricular acupuncture for postoperative pain control: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials. Anaesthesia 2008; 63(12):1343-8.
43. Usichenko TI, Kuchling S, Witstruck T et al. Auricular acupuncture for pain relief after ambulatory knee surgery: a randomized trial. CMAJ 2007; 176(2):179-83.
44. Tsang RC, Tsang PL, Ko CY et al. Effects of acupuncture and sham acupuncture in addition to physiotherapy in patients undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty – a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2007; 21(8):719-28.
45. Casimiro L, Brosseau L, Milne S et al. Acupuncture and electroacupuncture for the treatment of RA (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2002. Oxford: Update Software.
46. Wang C, de Pablo P, Chen X et al. Acupuncture for pain relief in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 59(9):1249-56.
47. Lee MS, Shinn BC, Ernst E. Acupuncture for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008; 47(12):1747-53.
48. Zanette Sde A, Born IG, Brenol JC et al. A pilot study of acupuncture as adjunctive treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2008; 27(5):627-35.
49. Roberts J, Huissoon A, Dretzke J et al. A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of acupuncture for allergic rhinitis. BMC Complement Altern Med 2008; 8:13.
50. Xue CC, An X, Cheung TP et al. Acupuncture for persistent allergic rhinitis: a randomised, sham-controlled trial. Med J Aust 2007; 187(6):337-41.
51. Linde K, Jobst K, Panton J. Acupuncture for chronic asthma (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2002. Oxford: Update Software.
52. Gruber W, Eber E, Malle-Scheid D et al. Laser acupuncture in children and adolescents with exercise induced asthma. Thorax 2002; 57(3):222-5.
53. Shapira MY, Berkman N, Ben-David G et al. Short-term acupuncture therapy is of no benefit in patients with moderate persistent asthma. Chest 2002; 121(5):1396-400.
54. Cheuk DK, Wong V. Acupuncture for epilepsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (2):CD005062.
55. Cheuk DK, Wong V. Acupuncture for epilepsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (4):CD005062.
56. Cheong YC, Hung Yu Ng E et al. Acupuncture and assisted conception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (4):CD006920.
57. El-Toukhy T, Sunkara SK, Khairy M et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of acupuncture in in vitro fertilisation. BJOG 2008; 115(10):1203-13.
58. Manheimer E, Zhang G, Udoff L et al. Effects of acupuncture on rates of pregnancy and live birth among women undergoing in vitro fertilsation: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2008; 336(7643):545-9.
59. Ng EH, So WS, Gao J et al. The role of acupuncture in the management of subfertility. Fertil Steril 2008; 90(1):1-13.
60. Dieterle S, Li C, Greb R et al. A prospective randomized placebo-controlled study of the effect of acupuncture in infertile patients with severe oligoasthenozoospermia. Fert Steril 2009 Apr 23. [Epub ahead of print].
61. Smith CA, Crowther CA. Acupuncture for induction of labour (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2002. Oxford: Update Software.
62. Smith CA, Crowther CA, Collins CT et al. Acupuncture to induce labor: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112(5):1067-74.
63. Avis NE, Legault C, Coeytaux RR et al. A randomized, controlled pilot study of acupuncture treatment for menopausal hot flashes. Menopause 2008; 15(6):1070-8.
64. Deng G, Vickers A, Yeung S et al. Randomized, controlled trial of acupuncture for the treatment of hot flashes in breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25(35):5584-90.
65. White AR, Rampes H, Ernst E. Acupuncture for smoking cessation (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2002. Oxford: Update Software.
66. Wu TP, Chen FP, Liu JY et al. A randomized controlled clinical trial of auricular acupuncture in smoking cessation. J Chin Med Assoc 2007; 70(8):331-8.
67. Bullock ML, Umen AJ, Culliton PD et al. Acupuncture treatment of alcoholic recidivism: a pilot study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1987; 11(3):292-5.
68. Bullock ML, Culliton PD, Olander RT. Controlled trial of acupuncture for severe recidivist alcoholism. Lancet 1989; 1(8652):1435-9.
69. Konefal J, Duncan R, Clemence C. Comparison of three levels of auricular acupuncture in an outpatient substance abuse treatment program. Altern Med J 1995; 2:8-17.
70. Margolin A, Avants SK, Chang P et al. Acupuncture for the treatment of cocaine dependence in methadone-maintained patients. Am J Addict 1993; 2:194-201.
71. Bullock ML, Kiresuk TJ, Pheley AM et al. Auricular acupuncture in the treatment of cocaine abuse. A study of efficacy and dosing. J Subst Abuse Treat 1999; 16(1):31-8.
72. Naeser MA. Acupuncture in the treatment of paralysis due to central nervous system damage. J Altern Complement Med 1996; 2(1):211-48.
73. Johansson BB, Haker E, von Arbin M et al. Acupuncture and transcutaneous nerve stimulation in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized, controlled trial. Stroke 2001; 32(3):707-13.
74. Wu H, Tang J, Lin X et al. Acupuncture for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (3):CD004131.
75. Xie Y, Wang L, He J et al. Acupuncture for dysphagia in acute stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (3):CD006076.
76. Hopwood V, Lewith G, Prescott P et al. Evaluating the efficacy of acupuncture in defined aspects of stroke recovery: a randomized, placebo controlled single blind study. J Neurol 2008; 255(6):858-66.
77. He L, Zhou MK, Zhou D et al. Acupuncture for Bell's palsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; (4):CD002914.
78. Law SK, Li T. Acupuncture for patients with glaucoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (4):CD006030.
79. Cheuk DK, Yeung WF, Chung KF et al. Acupuncture for insomnia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (3):CD005472.
80. Cui Y, Wang Y, Liu Z. Acupuncture for restless legs syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (4):CD006457.
81. Peng WN, Zhao H, Liu ZS et al. Acupuncture for vascular dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (2):CD004987.
82. Lee H, Kim SY, Park J et al. Acupuncture for lowering blood pressure: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Hypertens 2009; 22(1):122-8.
83. VanWormer AM, Lindquist R, Sendelbach SE. The effects of acupuncture on cardiac arrhythmias: a literature review. Heart Lung 2008; 37(6):425-31.
84. Lam YC, Kum WF, Durairajan SS et al. Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for idiopathic Parkinson's disease: a systematic review. J Altern Complement Med 2008; 14(6):663-71.
85. Lang H, Liu CZ, Chen X et al. Systematic review of clinical trials of acupuncture-related therapies for primary dysmenorrhea. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008; 87(11):1114-22.
86. Lu W, Hu D, Dean-Clower E et al. Acupuncture for chemotherapy-induced leukopenia: exploratory meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Soc Integr Oncol 2007; 5(1):1-10.
87. Wang H, Qi H, Wang BS et al. Is acupuncture beneficial in depression: a meta-analysis of 8 randomized controlled trials? J Affect Disord; 111(2-3):125-34.
88. Ma L. Acupuncture as a complementary therapy in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2009; 22(2):138-41.
89. Medicare Policy. Acupuncture for Fibromyalgia. 
90. Medicare Policy. Acupuncture for Osteoarthritis.
91. Kalichman, L, Vulfsons, S. (2010).Dry Needling in the management of musculoskeletal pain. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 23 (5), 640-646. (Level 2 Evidence - Independent study).
92. Srbely, J., Lee, D., Lowerson, M. (2010) Dry needle stimulation of Myofascial trigger points evokes segmental anti-nociceptive effects. Journal of Rehabilitative Medicine, 42 (5), 463-468. (Level 3 Evidence-Independent Study.

Coding Section

Procedure and diagnosis codes on Medical Policy documents are included only as a general reference tool for each policy. They may not be all-inclusive. 

This medical policy was developed through consideration of peer-reviewed medical literature generally recognized by the relevant medical community, U.S. FDA approval status, nationally accepted standards of medical practice and accepted standards of medical practice in this community and other nonaffiliated technology evaluation centers, reference to federal regulations, other plan medical policies and accredited national guidelines.

"Current Procedural Terminology © American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved" 

History From 2014 Forward