MRI Brain (Includes Internal Auditory Canal) - CAM 744

Description
Brain (head) MRI is the procedure of choice for most brain disorders. It provides clear images of the brainstem and posterior brain, which are difficult to view on a CT scan. It is also useful for the diagnosis of demyelinating disorders (such as multiple sclerosis (MS) that cause destruction of the myelin sheath of the nerve). The evaluation of blood flow and the flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is possible with this non-invasive procedure

Headache and Migraine
MRI for Headache — Generally, magnetic resonance imaging is the preferred imaging technique for evaluating the brain parenchyma, and CT is preferable for evaluating subarachnoid hemorrhage. CT is faster and more readily available than MRI and is often used in urgent clinical situations. Neurologic imaging is warranted in patients with headache disorders along with abnormal neurologic examination results or predisposing factors for brain pathology. Contrast-enhanced MRI is performed for evaluation of inflammatory, infectious, neoplastic, and demyelinating conditions.

Headache time frames and other characteristics — Headaches can be classified as acute, subacute or chronic. Acute headaches are present from hours to days, subacute from days to weeks and chronic headaches for more than 3 months. Acute severe headaches are more likely to be pathological (e.g., SAH, cerebral venous thrombosis) than non-acute (e.g., migraine, tension-type). Headaches can also be categorized as new onset or chronic/recurrent. Non-acute new onset headaches do not require imaging unless there is a red flag as delineated above. Incidental findings lead to additional medical procedures and expense that do not improve patient well-being. Primary headache syndromes, such as migraine and tension headaches, are often episodic with persistent or progressive headache not responding to treatment requiring further investigation (e.g., new daily persistent headache). Imaging is indicated in chronic headaches if there is a change in the headache frequency (number of headaches episodes/month), duration of each episode, severity of the headaches or new characteristics, such as changing aura or associated symptoms.1,2,3,4,220,221,222,223,224

Migraine with aura4,5,225 — The headache phase of a migraine is preceded and/or accompanied by transient neurological symptoms referred to as aura in at least a third of migraine attacks. Migraine with typical aura consists of visual and/or sensory and/or speech/language symptoms, but no motor, brainstem or retinal symptoms and is characterized by gradual development, duration of each symptom no longer than one hour, a mix of positive and negative features and complete reversibility. Atypical or complex aura includes motor, brainstem, monocular visual disturbances, or ocular cranial nerve involvement (hemiplegic migraine, basilar migraine/brainstem aura, retinal migraine, ophthalmoplegic migraine) and secondary causes need to be excluded. Additional features of an aura that raise concern for an underlying vascular etiology include late age of onset, short duration, evolution of the focal symptoms, negative rather than positive visual phenomenon, and history of vascular risk factors.

Individuals presenting with a new migraine with aura (especially an atypical or complex aura) can mimic a transient ischemic attack or an acute stroke. If there is a new neurologic deficit, imaging should be guided by concern for cerebrovascular disease, not that the individual has a headache.9,226

Drop Metastases
Drop Metastases — Drop metastases are intradural extramedullary spinal metastases that arise from intracranial lesions. Common examples of intracranial neoplasms that result in drop metastases include pineal tumors, ependymomas, medulloblastomas, germinomas, primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNET), glioblastomas multiform, anaplastic astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas and less commonly choroid plexus neoplasms and teratomas.209

Pulsatile Tinnitus
Pulsatile tinnitus has many etiologies, and the choice of study should be based on accompanying signs and symptoms. For general screening MRI brain with IAC/MRA brain and neck is approvable. If IIIH is suspected (typically with headache and vision changes in a younger woman with a high BMI), MRI/MRV brain is indicated. If there is concern for vascular etiology, CTA or MRA brain/neck is indicated. If there is associated hearing loss and neurological signs/symptoms, MRI brain with IAC is indicated. If the temporal bone is suspected to be involved and/or retrotympanic lesion seen on otoscopy, CT temporal bone/IAC is indicated. If there is concurrent concern for boney and a vascular issue, CTA of the head and neck can be used to evaluate both.

Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis
Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis210,227,228,229 — Leptomeningeal metastasis is an uncommon and typically late complication of cancer with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Diagnosis is often challenging with nonspecific presenting symptoms ranging from headache and confusion to focal neurologic deficits such as cranial nerve palsies. Standard diagnostic evaluation involves a neurologic examination, MRI of the brain and spine with gadolinium, and cytologic evaluation of the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF).
Hematologic malignancies (leukemia and lymphoma), primary brain tumors as well as solid malignancies can spread to the leptomeninges. The most common solid tumors giving rise to LM are breast cancer (12% – 35%), small and non-small cell lung cancer (10% – 26%), melanoma (5% – 25 %), gastrointestinal malignancies (4% – 14%), and cancers of unknown primary (1 – 7%).

Brain MRI/MRA
Combination MRI/MRA of the Brain — This is one of the most misused combination studies and other than what is indicated above these examinations should be ordered in sequence, not together. Vascular abnormalities can be visualized on the brain MRI.

Vertigo
MRI and Vertigo — The most common causes of vertigo seen are benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), vestibular neuronitis (VN) and Meniere’s disease. These peripheral causes of vertigo are benign, and treatment involves reassurance and management of symptoms. Central causes of vertigo, such as cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs), tumors and multiple sclerosis (MS), need to be considered if the individual presents with associated neurological symptoms, such as weakness, diplopia, sensory changes, ataxia, or confusion. Magnetic resonance imaging is appropriate in the evaluation of individuals with vertigo who have neurologic signs and symptoms, progressive unilateral hearing loss or risk factors for cerebrovascular disease. MRI is more appropriate than CT for diagnosing vertigo due to its superiority in visualizing the posterior portion of the brain, where most central nervous system disease that causes vertigo is found. A full neurologic and otologic evaluation including provocative maneuvers, vestibular function testing and audiogram can help evaluate vertigo of unclear etiology and differentiate between central and peripheral vertigo.

Macrocephaly
MRI for Macrocephaly — Consider ultrasound in infants with macrocephaly and a normal neurological examination, no evidence of increased ICP and an open anterior fontanelle. If head US is normal, the infant should be monitored closely.230 The anterior fontanelle generally closes between 10 and 24 months of age, with 3% closing between 5 – 9 months and 11% after 24 months. (231)

Anosmia
Anosmia
— Nonstructural causes of anosmia include post-viral symptoms, medications (Amitriptyline, Enalapril, Nifedipine, Propranolol, Penicillamine, Sumatriptan, Cisplatin, Trifluoperazine, Propylthiouracil). These should be considered prior to advanced imaging to look for a structural cause.

Anosmia and dysgeusia have been reported as common early symptoms in individuals with COVID-19, occurring in greater than 80 percent of individuals. For isolated anosmia, imaging is typically not needed once the diagnosis of COVID has been made given the high association. As such, COVID testing should be done prior to imaging.232,233,234
MRI Orbits, Face, and Neck MRI rather than MRI Brain is the mainstay for directly imaging the olfactory apparatus and sinonasal or anterior cranial fossa tumors that may impair or directly involve the olfactory apparatus.

Temporal Arteritis
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is an inflammatory disorder that should be considered in individuals over the age of 50 with the following signs or symptoms: new headaches, acute onset of visual disturbances (especially transient monocular visual loss), jaw claudication, constitutional symptoms, tenderness over the temporal artery, and elevated ESR and/or CRP. A diagnosis of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is highly associated. Extra- and intracranial cerebral vasculitis can also be seen but is rarer, and strokes are related to vasculitis of extracranial cerebral arteries causing vertebral or internal carotid arteries stenosis. Gold standard for diagnosis of GCA is temporal artery biopsy. Color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) can be used as a surrogate for temporal artery biopsy in some cases.

High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can visualize the temporal arteries when used with contrast.

Galactorrhea and Hyperprolactinemia
Galactorrhea and MRI — Isolated galactorrhea without elevated prolactin (normoprolactinemic) is usually due to breast pathology, i.e., breast feeding, trauma, ill-fitting undergarments. Consider mammogram, breast ultrasound, and serial dilution of the individual’s prolactin sample to correct for possible hook effect.235,236

Chart 1: Causes of Hyperprolactinemia48

Physiological

  1. Coitus
  2. Exercise
  3. Lactation
  4. Pregnancy
  5. Sleep
  6. Stress

Pathological

  1. Hypothalamic-pituitary stalk damage
    1. Granulomas
    2. Infiltrations

 

  1. Irradiation
  2. Rathke’s cyst
  3. Trauma: pituitary stalk section, suprasellar surgery
  4. Tumors: craniopharyngioma, germinoma, hypothalamic metastases, meningioma, suprasellar pituitary mass extension
  1. Pituitary
    1. Acromegaly
    2. Idiopathic
    3. Lymphocytic hypophysitis or parasellar mass
    4. Macroadenoma (compressive)
    5. Macroprolactinemia
    6. Plurihormonal adenoma
    7. Prolactinoma
    8. Surgery
    9. Trauma
  2. Systematic Disorders
    1. Chest  neurogenic chest wall trauma, surgery, herpes zoster
    2. Chronic renal failure
    3. Cirrhosis
    4. Cranial radiation
    5. Epileptic seizures
    6. Polycystic ovarian disease
    7. Pseudocyesis

Pharmacological

  1. Anesthetics
  2. Anticonvulsant
  3. Antihistamines (H2)
  4. Antihypertensives
  5. Cholinergic agonist
  6. Drug-induced hypersecretion
  7. Catecholamine depletory
  8. Dopamine receptor blockers
  9. Dopamine synthesis inhibitor

 

  1. Estrogens: oral contraceptives, oral contraceptive withdrawal
  2. Neuroleptics/antipsychotics

Central Venous Thrombosis
A MR venogram is indicated for the definite evaluation of a central venous thrombosis/dural sinus thrombosis. The most frequent presentations are isolated headache, intracranial hypertension syndrome (headache, nausea/vomiting, transient visual obscurations, pulsatile tinnitus, CN VI palsy, papilledema),237 seizures, focal neurological deficits, and encephalopathy. Risk factors are hypercoagulable states inducing genetic prothrombotic conditions, antiphospholipid syndrome and other acquired prothrombotic diseases (such as cancer), oral contraceptives, pregnancy, puerperium (6-weeks postpartum), infections, and trauma. COVID-19 infection is associated with hypercoagulability, a thromboinflammatory response, and an increased incidence of venous thromboembolic events (VTE).238,239 Since venous thrombosis can cause SAH, infarctions, and hemorrhage, parenchymal imaging with MRI/CT is also appropriate.30,240,241

Non-aneurysmal Vascular Malformations
Non-aneurysmal vascular malformations can be divided in low flow vascular malformations and high flow vascular malformations. Low flow vascular malformations include dural venous anomalies (DVA), cavernomas, and capillary telangiectasias. High flow vascular malformations include AVM and dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVF). For low flow malformations, MRI is the study of choice. Limited medical literature is available to support vascular imagining (CTA or MRA). CTA plays a limited role in the assessment of cavernoma but may be used to demonstrate a DVA. MRA is not usually helpful in the assessment of cavernoma, capillary telangiectasia, and DVA. Vascular imaging is indicated in high flow vascular malformations.242

There is no evidence to support screening of first-degree relatives for AVMs.243 The risk of having an AVM may be higher than in the general population, but absolute risk is low.

Stroke/TIA
MRI and recent stroke or transient ischemic attack — When revascularization therapy is not indicated or available in patients with an ischemic stroke or TIA, the focus of the work-up is on secondary prevention. Both stroke and TIA should have an evaluation for high-risk modifiable factors such as carotid stenosis atrial fibrillation as the cause of ischemic symptoms.244 Diagnostic recommendations include neuroimaging evaluation as soon as possible, preferably with magnetic resonance imaging, including DWI; noninvasive imaging of the extracranial vessels should be performed, and noninvasive imaging of intracranial vessels is reasonable.245

Patients with a history of stroke and recent work-up with new signs or symptoms indicating progression or complications of the initial CVA should have repeat brain imaging as an initial study. Patients with remote or silent strokes discovered on imaging should be evaluated for high-risk modifiable risk factors based on the location and type of the presumed etiology of the brain injury.

Table 1: Gait and Brain Imaging
Table 1: Gait and Brain Imaging246,247,248,249,250,251

Gait

Characteristic

Work up/Imaging

Hemiparetic

Spastic unilateral, circumduction

Brain and/or, Cervical spine imaging based on associated symptoms

Diplegic

Spastic bilateral, circumduction

Brain, Cervical and Thoracic Spine imaging

Myelopathic

Wide based, stiff, unsteady

Cervical and/or Thoracic spine MRI based on associated symptoms

Ataxic

Broad based, clumsy, staggering, lack of coordination, usually also with limb ataxia

Brain imaging

Apraxic

Magnetic, shuffling, difficulty initiating

Brain imaging

Parkinsonian

Stooped, small steps, rigid, turning en bloc, decreased arm swing

Brain Imaging

Choreiform

Irregular, jerky, involuntary movements

Medication review, consider brain imaging as per movement disorder Brain MR guidelines

Sensory ataxic

Cautious, stomping, worsening without visual input (i.e., + Romberg)

EMG, blood work, consider spinal (cervical or thoracic cord imaging) imaging based on EMG

Neurogenic

Steppage, dragging of toes

EMG, if there is foot drop, Lumbar spine MRI

Pelvis MR appropriate evidence of plexopathy

Vestibular

Insecure, veer to one side, worse when eyes closed, vertigo

Consider Brain/IAC MRI as per GL


Non-neurological causes of gait dysfunction include pain (antalgic), side effects of drugs (analgesic, antihistamines, benzos, psych meds, antihypertensives), visual loss, hearing impairment, orthopedic disorders, rheumatologic disorders, psychogenic, and cardiorespiratory problems (orthostasis).247,249,250,251

Neurological Deficits
Examples of abnormal reflexes related to upper motor neuron lesion/central pathology include hyperreflexia, clonus, Hoffman sign and Babinski, snout, palmar grasp, and rooting reflexes.

Visual loss has many possible etiologies, and MRI is only indicated in suspected neurological causes of visual loss based on history and exam. Visual field defects, such as bitemporal hemianopsia, homonymous hemianopsia, or quadranopsia, require imaging as well as does suspected optic nerve pathology. Subjective symptoms such as blurred vision or double vision with no clear correlate on neurological examination requires a comprehensive eye evaluation to exclude more common causes, such as cataracts, refractive errors, retinopathy, glaucoma, or macular degeneration. Transient visual loss with history consistent with TIA but normal exam at time of examination also should be imaged. Positive visual phenomena, such as photopsias or scintillations that march across the visual field, suggest migraine whereas negative phenomenon, such as shaded or blurred, is more characteristic of ischemia.

Definitions
MMSE — The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) is a tool that can be used to assess mental status systematically and thoroughly. It is an 11-question measure that tests five areas of cognitive function: orientation, registration, attention and calculation, recall, and language. The MMSE has been the most commonly used measure of cognitive function in dementia research, but researchers have recognized that it is relatively insensitive and variable in mildly impaired individuals. The maximum score is 30. A score of 23 or lower is indicative of cognitive impairment. The MMSE takes only 5 – 10 minutes to administer and is, therefore, practical to use repeatedly and routinely.

MoCA — The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was designed as a rapid screening instrument for mild cognitive dysfunction. It assesses different cognitive domains: attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. MoCA differs from the MMSE mainly by including tests of executive function and abstraction, and by putting less weight on orientation to time and place. Ten of the MMSE's 30 points are scored solely on the time- place orientation test, whereas the MoCA assigns it a maximum of six points. The MoCA also puts more weight on recall and attention-calculation performance, while de-emphasizing language skill. Time to administer the MoCA is approximately 10 minutes. The total possible score is 30 points; a score of 26 or above is considered normal.

MRI and developmental delay — Significant developmental delay is defined as significant delay (more than two standard deviations below the mean) in one or more developmental domains: gross/fine motor, speech/language, cognition, social/personal, and activities of daily living. Isolated delay in social/language development is characteristic of autism spectrum disorders or hearing loss. Isolated delay in motor development is characteristic of cerebral palsy (a static encephalopathy) or myopathy. Global developmental delay (GDD) is a subset of developmental delay defined as significant delay (by at least 2 SD’s) in two or more developmental categories. Note that the term “GDD” is usually reserved for children <5 years old, whereas in older children >5 years, disability is quantifiable with IQ testing.

Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN) — According to the International Headache Society, TN is defined as “a disorder characterized by recurrent unilateral brief electric shock-like pain, abrupt in onset and termination, limited to the distribution of one or more divisions of the trigeminal nerve and triggered by innocuous stimuli.”4 Atypical features include bilateral, hearing loss, dizziness/vertigo, visual changes, sensory loss, numbness, pain > 2 min, pain outside trigeminal nerve distribution and progression.121

Occipital Neuralgia — According to the International Headache Society, occipital neuralgia is defined as “Unilateral or bilateral paroxysmal, shooting or stabbing pain in the posterior part of the scalp, in the distribution(s) of the greater, lesser and/or third occipital nerves, sometimes accompanied by diminished sensation or dysesthesia in the affected area and commonly associated with tenderness over the involved nerve(s). Pain is eased temporarily by local anesthetic block of the affected nerve(s). Occipital neuralgia must be distinguished from occipital referral of pain arising from the atlantoaxial or upper zygapophyseal joints or from tender trigger points in neck muscles or their insertions.”121

Low risk brief resolved unexplained event (BRUE) formerly apparent life-threatening event (ALTE) requires all the following:

  • Age > 60 days
  • Gestational age ≥ 32 weeks or older and corrected gestational age ≥ 45 weeks
  • First brief event
  • Event lasting < 1 minute
  • No CPR required by the trained medical provider
  • No concerning historical features or physical examination findings.

Policy 
INDICATIONS

Headache1,2
Evaluation of Headache

  • Chronic headache with a change in character/pattern (e.g., more frequent, increased severity, or duration)3
  • Cluster headaches or other trigeminal-autonomic cephalgias, i.e., paroxysmal hemicrania, hemicrania continua, short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks (SUNCT/SUNA) imaging is indicated once to eliminate secondary causes3,4
  • Acute headache, sudden onset:
    • With a personal or family history (brother, sister, parent, or child) of brain aneurysm or AVM (arteriovenous malformation) OR
    • < 48 hours of “worst headache in my life” or “thunderclap” headache (Sudden onset new headache reaching maximum intensity within 2-3 minutes, lasting more than 5 minutes).
    • Prior history of stroke or intracranial bleed
    • Known coagulopathy or anticoagulation.
  • New onset of headache with any of the following:3,5,6
    • Acute, new, or fluctuating neurologic deficits, such as sensory deficits, limb weakness, abnormal reflexes (pathological, asymmetric, hyperreflexia), speech difficulties, visual loss, lack of coordination, or mental status changes or with signs of increased intracranial pressure (papilledema). (See background)
    • History of cancer or significantly immunocompromised
    • Fever
    • Subacute head trauma
    • Pregnancy or puerperium7,8
    • Age 503,5,9,10
    • Severe unilateral headache with radiation to or from the neck, associated with suspicion of carotid or vertebral artery dissection
    • Related to activity or event (sexual activity, exertion, Valsalva, position), new or progressively worsening3,10,11,12
    • Persistent or progressively worsening during a course of physician-directed treatment3,13

Note: Neuroimaging warranted for atypical/complex migraine aura, but not for a typical migraine aura3 (see background)

Special Considerations in the Pediatric Population With Persistent Headache14,15,16

  • Occipital location
  • Age < 6 years
  • Symptoms indicative of increased intracranial pressure, such as recurring headaches after waking with or without associated nausea/vomiting
  • Documented absence of family history of headache
  • Severe headache in a child with an underlying disease that predisposes to intracranial pathology (e.g., immune deficiency, sickle cell disease, neurofibromatosis, history of neoplasm, coagulopathy, hypertension, congenital heart disease)

Neurological Symptoms or Deficits17,18,19,20,21,22
Acute, new, or fluctuating neurologic symptoms or deficits such as, sensory deficits, limb weakness, abnormal reflexes (pathological, asymmetric, hyperreflexia), speech difficulties, visual loss, lack of coordination, or mental status changes (see background)

Stroke and Vascular Disease

  • Known or suspected stroke with any acute, new, or fluctuating symptoms or deficits such as sensory deficits, limb weakness, speech difficulties, visual loss, lack of coordination, or mental status changes (see background)
  • Suspected stroke with a personal or first-degree family history (brother, sister, parent, or child) of aneurysm or known coagulopathy or on anticoagulation.
  • Symptoms of transient ischemic attack (TIA) (episodic neurologic symptoms such as sensory deficits, limb weakness, speech difficulties, visual loss, lack of coordination, or mental status changes)
  • Screening for silent cerebral infarcts in early school age children and adults with

HbSS sickle cell disease or HbSβ0 thalassemia26

  • Evaluation of neurological signs or symptoms in sickle cell disease26,27
  • High stroke risk in sickle cell patients (2  16 years of age) with a transcranial doppler velocity > 20026,28

Evaluation of Known or Suspected Vascular Disease

  • Evaluation of suspected acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)
  • Suspected central venous thrombosis  see background29,30
  • Known Moyamoya disease or reversible cerebral vasoconstriction with any new or changing neurological signs or symptoms.
  • Follow-up for known hemorrhage, hematoma, or vascular abnormalities

Note: MRI is the study of choice for detecting cavernous malformations (CCM) and other low flow vascular malformations (see background). Follow-up imaging of known CCM should be done only to guide treatment decisions or to investigate new symptoms. First-degree relatives of patients with more than one family member with a CCM should have a screening MRI as well as genetic counseling31,32,33

Head Trauma
Evaluation of Known or Suspected Trauma34,35,36

For evaluation of known or suspected trauma

  • Known or suspected trauma or injury to the head with documentation of one or more of the following acute, new, or fluctuating:
    • Focal neurologic findings
    • Motor changes
    • Mental status changes
    • Amnesia
    • Vomiting
    • Seizures
    • Headache
    • Signs of increased intracranial pressure
  • Known coagulopathy or on anticoagulation.
  • Known or suspected skull fracture by physical exam and/or prior imaging
  • Post concussive syndrome if persistent or disabling symptoms and MRI has not been performed.
  • Subacute or chronic traumatic brain injury with new cognitive and/or neurologic deficit

Brain Tumor, Mass, or Metastasis
Evaluation of Suspected Tumor/Mass/Cyst (3,37)

  • Suspected brain tumor with any acute, new, or fluctuating neurologic symptoms or deficits such as sensory deficits, limb weakness, abnormal reflexes (pathological, asymmetric, hyperreflexia), speech difficulties, visual loss, lack of coordination, or mental status changes (see background)
  • Lesion with atypical features for further evaluation or follow up.
  • Suspected Pituitary Tumors38,39,40,41,42,43
    • Neurologic findings (e.g., visual field deficit suggesting compression of the optic chiasm, diplopia, gaze palsy)
    • Suspected hypofunctioning pituitary gland based on hormonal testing.
      • Hypopituitarism
      • Growth hormone deficiency
      • Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism [low sex hormones and gonadotropins (FSH/LH)]44
        • Total testosterone persistently < 150 with low or normal LH/FSH i.e., severe secondary hypogonadism OR
        • Total testosterone levels persistently borderline around the lower limits of normal range (200 – 400 ng/dL) with low or normal LH/FSH; AND
          • Neurological signs or symptoms; OR
          • Other pituitary hormonal abnormalities; OR
          • Low free testosterone and consideration and addressment of reversible functional causes of gonadotropin suppression (e.g., obesity, opioid use, diabetes, steroid use, or comorbid illness)
    • Suspected hyperfunctioning pituitary gland based on hormonal testing.
      • Central hyperthyroidism (high TSH)
      • Cushing syndrome suspected (high ACTH (> 5) with cortisol suppression on low or high dose dexamethasone suppression test)45,46,47
      • Acromegaly/gigantism (high GH/IGF-1)
      • Elevated prolactin48,49
        • ≥ 250 ng/mL OR
        • After evaluation for another cause (e.g., pregnancy, hypothyroidism, renal insufficiency, medication- see background)
          • 100 ng/mL OR
          • Persistently elevated OR
          • Neuroendocrine signs or symptoms (i.e., headache, galactorrhea, abnormal menses, infertility, or bitemporal hemianopsia) OR
          • Abnormal pituitary hormones (low testosterone/estrogen/ progesterone AND low or normal LH/FSH)
    • Central Diabetes Insipidus (low ADH)
    • Precocious puberty in a child (male < 9; female < 8), with hormonal studies suggesting a central cause50
    • Pituitary apoplexy with sudden onset of neurological and hormonal symptoms
  • Histiocytic Neoplasms for screening and/or with neurological signs or symptoms51,52
    • Erdheim-Chester Disease
    • Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis
    • Rosai-Dorfman Disease

Evaluation of Known Brain Lesion/Cyst

  • Follow-up of known pituitary adenoma
    • New neuroendocrine signs or symptoms
    • Functioning adenoma to assess response to treatment and 1-year follow-up after drug holiday38,39,40,53
    • Asymptomatic Macroadenoma (≥ 10 mm) follow-up every 6 – 18 months, post-surgical follow-up every 1 – 2 years after surgery54
    • Asymptomatic, non-functioning Microadenoma < 10 mm repeat in one year; if stable, repeat every 2 – 3 years54
  • Follow-up of known pineal cyst ( 5 mm) if there are atypical features or symptoms (e.g., headaches, gaze paresis, ataxia, papilledema, nausea/vomiting)55
  • Follow up of known Rathke cleft cyst56
    • If no symptoms, MRI at 1/3/5 years to stability
    • With new neurological symptoms or atypical imaging features
    • Post treatment, yearly for 5 years.
  • Follow-up of known arachnoid cyst57,58
    • In patients < 4 years old, serial imaging is warranted.
    • In patients > 4 years old, repeat imaging only if newly symptomatic, i.e., headaches, increased intracranial pressure, hydrocephalus, local mass effect, seizures, visual/endocrine dysfunction.
  • Midline dermoid cysts/sinuses with concern for intracranial extension59,60,61
  • Histiocytic neoplasms to assess treatment response and surveillance of known brain lesions51,52
    • Erdheim-Chester Disease
    • Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis
    • Rosai-Dorfman Disease

Brain MRI for Known Cancer
Brain MRI is appropriate for any malignancy when there are signs or symptoms of brain metastases (e.g., headache, sensory deficits, memory problems). There does not need to be a neuro deficit on exam or other workup done first for a patient with cancer.

Initial Staging
Brain MRI is appropriate during the initial diagnostic workup for the following cancer types:

  • Kidney cancer62
  • Lung cancer (NSCLC and SCLC)63,64
  • Melanoma
    • Primary mucosal tumor of the head and neck  any stage65
    • Stage III or IV for any primary site66
  • Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine cancer67
  • Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia with pulmonary metastases68
  • Leukemia with suspicion of CNS involvement69,70,71
  • Breast cancer stage IV72


Restaging
Brain MRI is appropriate every 2 – 3 cycles of chemotherapy during active treatment for the following diseases:

  • B Cell lymphomas (if CNS lymphoma present or concern for CNS lymphoma)73
  • Breast cancer, stage IV or any stage if suspected development of brain metastases72
  • Cutaneous melanoma, stage III or IV or any stage if suspected development of brain metastases66
  • Non-small cell lung cancer63
    • All stages  initial staging and end of treatment
    • Stage IV  every 2 – 3 cycles of treatment
  • Small cell lung cancer64
  • Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix74
    • All stages  initial staging
    • Stage IV  every 2  3 cycles of treatment
  • Adult and pediatric CNS tumors75

Surveillance
Brain MRI is appropriate during surveillance in the following diseases:

  • B Cell lymphomas (if history of CNS lymphoma or concern for CNS lymphoma) every 6 months for 2 years then as clinically indicated73
  • Breast cancer72
    • Stage IV every 3 – 6 months
    • All other stages if suspected development of brain metastases
  • Cutaneous melanoma66
    • Stage III, IV every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 – 12 months indefinitely
    • All other stages if suspected development of brain metastases
    • Non-small cell lung cancer63
    • Stage IV every 3 months
    • All other stages if suspected development of brain metastases
  • Small cell lung cancer64
    • Limited stage every 2 – 6 months for 1 – 2 years then every 6 – 12 months indefinitely
    • Extensive stage every 2 months for 1 year, every 3 – 4 months for years 2 and 3, every 6 months during years 4 and 5, then annually
  • Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix74
    • If suspected development of brain metastases
  • Adult and pediatric CNS tumors75
    • For histologies not specifically detailed below, every 3 – 6 months for 3 – 5 years then at least annually.
      • High-grade glioma/Glioblastoma  2 – 8 weeks after radiation therapy, then every 2 – 4 months for 3 years, then every 3 – 6 months indefinitely
      • Ependymoma  every 3 – 4 months for 1 year, every 4 – 6 months for 1 year, every 6 – 12 months for 5 – 10 years, then as clinically indicated
      • Medulloblastoma  every 3 months for 1 year, every 6 – 12 months for 5 – 10 years, then as clinically indicated.
      • Meningioma  every 2 – 4 months for 3 years then every 3 – 6 months indefinitely


Combination Studies for Initial Staging, Active Monitoring, or Evaluation of Suspected Metastases37
< 5 concurrent studies to include CT or MRI of any of the following areas as appropriate depending on the cancer: Neck, Abdomen, Pelvis, Chest, Brain, Cervical Spine, Thoracic Spine or Lumbar Spine
 

Seizure Disorders
Evaluation of Known or Suspected Seizure Disorder76,77,78,79,80,81,82

  • New onset of an unprovoked seizure
  • Newly identified change in seizure activity/pattern
  • Known seizure disorder without previous imaging.
  • Medically refractory epilepsy

Special considerations in the pediatric population76,82,83,84
Imaging is indicated in complex febrile seizures accompanied by any of the following:

  • Abnormal neurologic exam.
  • Autism, cerebral palsy or developmental delay
  • Focal onset
  • Post-ictal Todd's paralysis (when a seizure is followed by a brief period of temporary paralysis)
  • Recurrent in 24 hours
  • Duration > 15 minutes
  • Abnormal EEG

Note imaging is not indicated for:

  • Simple febrile seizures that have none of the above characteristics.
  • Benign epilepsy syndromes/idiopathic focal or generalized epilepsy with typical features such as: Childhood absence epilepsy (JAE),(BECTS) Benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes also known as Benign Rolandic Epilepsy (BRE), Juvenile absence epilepsy (JAE), Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), benign epilepsy childhood with centrotemporal spikes (BECCT)

Multiple Sclerosis
Evaluation of Suspected Multiple Sclerosis85,86

  • For evaluation of patient with neurologic symptoms or deficits suspicious for MS with
    • A clinically isolated syndrome (optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, or brain stem syndrome); OR
    • Recurrent episodes of variable neurological signs or symptoms not attributable to another cause
  • To demonstrate dissemination in time for diagnosis (every 6 – 12 months)

Evaluation of Known Multiple Sclerosis86,87

  • To establish a new baseline (no recent imaging, postpartum, or 3 – 6 months after switching disease modifying therapy)
  • Prior to starting or switching disease-modifying therapy
  • 6-month repeat scan in patients with MRI disease activity that is not associated with new clinical symptoms on a routine follow-up scan (i.e., Radiographically isolated syndrome)88
  • Every 1 – 2 years while on disease-modifying therapy to assess for subclinical disease activity, less frequently when stable for 2 – 3 years.
  • New signs or symptoms suggested of an exacerbation or unexpected clinical worsening.
  • Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML) surveillance for patients on natalizumab (Tysabri)89
    • 12 months after the start of treatment in all patients
    • Further surveillance MRI scanning timing is based on risk.
      • Annually, if anti-JCV antibody negative,
      • Every 3 – 4 months, if high risk of PML occurrence:
        • seropositive for JC virus and have been treated with natalizumab for ≥ 18 months OR
        • high anti-JC virus antibody index values (> 0.9) OR
        • previously treated with immunosuppressive therapies
    • Brain MRI every 3 – 4 months for up to 12 months, in high-risk patients who switch from natalizumab to other therapeutics.

Note: In the pediatric population, use a similar scan frequency for disease and therapeutic monitoring. Increase frequency of imaging (e.g., every 6 months) in children with highly active disease or in situations where imaging will change management.

Infectious or Inflammatory Disease
Evaluation of Known or Suspected Infection or Inflammatory Disease

  • Suspected intracranial abscess or brain infection with acute altered mental status or with positive lab findings (such as elevated WBCs) OR follow-up assessment during or after treatment completed.
  • Meningitis with positive signs and symptoms (such as fever, headache, mental status changes, stiff neck) OR with positive lab findings (such as elevated white blood cells or abnormal lumbar puncture fluid exam)90,91
  • Suspected encephalitis with headache and altered mental status or follow-up as clinically warranted.
  • Endocarditis with suspected septic emboli
  • Suspected Giant Cell (temporal arteritis) in a patient 50 with temporal headache, abrupt visual changes, jaw claudication, temporal artery tenderness, constitutional symptoms or elevated ESR;92,93,94,95 AND
    • Negative initial work-up (color Doppler ultrasonography or biopsy); OR
    • Atypical features, failure to response to treatment or concern for intracranial involvement

Note: Protocol should include high-resolution contrast-enhanced imaging the temporal artery

  • Vasculitis
    • Central Nervous System (CNS) involvement in patients with known or suspected vasculitis or autoimmune disease with abnormal inflammatory markers or autoimmune antibodies
    • Suspected primary CNS vasculitis based on neurological signs and symptoms with completed infectious/inflammatory lab work-up29,96,97

Note: Vessel wall MRI (ordered as Brain MRI) can also be performed in the evaluation of vasculitides98

  • Immunocompromised patient (e.g., transplant recipients, HIV with CD4 < 200, primary immunodeficiency syndromes, hematologic malignancies) with focal neurologic symptoms, headaches, behavioral, cognitive or personality changes
  • Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML)99,100,101)
    • Suspected based on clinical symptoms and/or JC virus status in an immunocompromised patient.
    • Follow-up of known PML as clinically indicated.
  • Neurosarcoidosis102,103
    • Initial Evaluation:
      • Suspected based on neurological sign/symptoms and lab work (ACE, CSF analysis) OR
      • Known history of sarcoidosis with neurological signs or symptoms
    • Follow-up of known neurosarcoidosis:
      • To assess treatment response
      • Worsening signs or symptoms

Cognitive Impairment
Evaluation of Cognitive Impairment104,105,106,107

  • Mental status score of either MMSE or MoCA of less than 26 or other similar mental status instruments*/formal neuropsychological testing showing at least mild cognitive impairment AND a completed basic metabolic workup (such as thyroid function testing, liver function testing, complete blood count, electrolytes, and B12)
  • *Other examples include Mini-Cog, Memory Impairment Screen, Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination (SLUMS), Brief Alzheimer's Screen (BAS), Blessed Dementia Scale (BDS), Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR)108,109

Treatment of Alzheimer's disease With Anti-Amyloid-β Monoclonal Antibodies110,111
Baseline and surveillance imaging as per FDA labeling

Movement Disorders21,112,113,114,115
Evaluation of Movement Disorders

  • For evaluation of acute onset of a movement disorder with concern for stroke or hemorrhage
  • For evaluation of suspected Parkinson’s with atypical feature or unresponsive to levodopa
  • Note: Atypical parkinsonian syndromes include progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), multiple system atrophy (MSA), corticobasal degeneration (CBD), and dementia with Lewy bodies.
  • For evaluation of new non-Parkinson neurological symptoms in known Parkinson’s disease complicating the evaluation of the current condition
  • For the evaluation of other movement disorder to exclude a structural lesion (i.e., suspected Huntington disease, chorea, hemiballismus, atypical dystonia)

Note: MRI not indicated in essential tremor, Tourette’ syndrome, or isolated focal dystonia (e.g., blepharospasm, cervical dystonia, laryngeal dystonia, oromandibular dystonia, writer’s dystonia)114,116

Cranial Nerve and Vision Abnormalities
Vision Abnormalities

For evaluation of cranial nerve and visual abnormalities

  • Optic neuritis
  • Abnormal eye findings on physical or neurologic examination (papilledema, pathologic nystagmus, optic atrophy, ocular nerve palsies, new onset anisocoria, visual field deficit, etc.) Note: See background
  • Binocular diplopia with concern for intracranial pathology after comprehensive eye evaluation117,118
  • Childhood strabismus with development delay or abnormal fundoscopic exam to rule out intracranial abnormalities119
  • Horner’s syndrome with symptoms localizing the lesion to the central nervous system120

Other Cranial Neuropathies

  • Trigeminal neuralgia or neuropathy3,121,122,123
  • Occipital Neuralgia to exclude a structural lesion, notably in atypical cases124
  • Bell’s Palsy  if atypical signs, slow resolution beyond three weeks, no improvement at four months, or facial twitching/spasms prior to onset125,126
  • Hemifacial spasm121,127
  • Other objective cranial nerve palsy (CN IX – XII)121,128
  • Bulbar symptoms, i.e., difficulty in chewing, weakness of the facial muscles, dysarthria, palatal weakness, dysphagia, and dysphonia and/or signs, i.e., atrophy and fasciculations of the tongue and absent gag reflex121
  • Pseudobulbar symptoms, i.e., dysphagia, dysarthria, facial weakness, sudden, stereotyped emotional outbursts that are not reflective of mood and/or signs, i.e., spastic tongue and exaggerated gag/jaw jerk129

Congenital Abnormalities
Evaluation of Known or Suspected Congenital Abnormalities

  • Known or suspected congenital abnormality with any acute, new, or fluctuating neurologic, motor, or mental status changes
  • Evaluation of macrocephaly in an infant/child < 18 with previously abnormal US, abnormal neurodevelopmental examination, signs of increased ICP or closed anterior fontanelle130
  • Evaluation of microcephaly in an infant/child < 18131
  • Evaluation of craniosynostosis and other skull deformities. CT is preferred imaging to assess bony structures; MRI imaging is preferred to assess intracranial soft tissue132,133
  • Evaluation of the corticomedullary junction in Achondroplasia134
  • Cerebral palsy if etiology has not been established in the neonatal period, there is change in the expected clinical or developmental profile or concern for progressive neurological disorder135
  • Prior treatment OR treatment planned for congenital abnormality.

Note: For evaluation of known or suspected hydrocephalus please see section on CSF abnormalities.

Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Abnormalities
Evaluation of Known or Suspected CSF Abnormalities

  • Evaluation of suspected hydrocephalus with any acute, new, or fluctuating neurologic, motor, or mental status changes
  • Known hydrocephalus
  • For initial evaluation of a suspected Arnold Chiari malformation136,
  • Follow-up imaging of a known type II or type III Arnold Chiari malformation. For Arnold Chiari type I, follow-up imaging only if new or changing signs/symptoms137
  • Initial evaluation for a known syrinx or syringomyelia
  • Known or suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH)138
    • With symptoms of gait difficulty, cognitive disturbance, and urinary incontinence
  • Follow-up shunt evaluation139
    • Post operativity if indicated based on underlying disease or pre-operative radiographic findings and/or
    • 6 – 12 months after placement and/or
    • With neurologic symptoms that suggest shunt malfunction
  • Evaluation of known or suspected cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage140
  • Cisternography for intermittent and complex CSF rhinorrhea/otorrhea. CSF fluid should always be confirmed with laboratory testing (Beta-2 transferrin assay)140,141
  • Suspected spontaneous intra-cranial hypotension with distinct postural headache (other symptoms include nausea, vomiting, dizziness, tinnitus, diplopia neck pain or imbalance)3,142
  • CSF flow study for evaluation and management of CSF flow disorders143,144

Often congenital, but can present later in life; or less commonly acquired secondary to tumor, stroke, trauma, infection, etc.

Procedural Evaluations
Preoperative/Procedural Evaluation

  • Pre-operative evaluation for a planned surgery or procedure

Postoperative/Procedural Evaluation

  • A follow-up study may be needed to help evaluate a patient’s progress after treatment, procedure, intervention, or surgery. Documentation requires a medical reason that clearly indicates why additional imaging is needed for the type and area(s) requested.

Prior Imaging
Further Evaluation of Indeterminate Findings on Prior Imaging

Unless follow up is otherwise specified within the guideline:

  • For initial evaluation of an inconclusive finding on a prior imaging report that requires further clarification.
  • One follow-up exam of a prior indeterminate MR/CT finding to ensure no suspicious interval change has occurred. (No further surveillance unless specified as highly suspicious or change was found on last follow-up exam)

Other Indications

  • Vertigo associated with any of the following20,145,146
    • Signs or symptoms suggestive of a CNS lesion (ataxia, visual loss, double vision, weakness, or a change in sensation)
    • Progressive unilateral hearing loss or tinnitus
    • Risk factors for cerebrovascular disease with concern for stroke.
    • After full neurologic examination and vestibular testing with concern for central vertigo (i.e., skew deviation, vertical nystagmus, head thrust test, videonystagmography [VNG]/electronystagmography [ENG])
  • Diagnosis of central sleep apnea on polysomnogram
    • Children > 1 year147
    • Adults in the absence of heart failure, chronic opioid use, high altitude, or treatment emergent central sleep apnea AND concern for a central neurological cause (Chiari malformation, tumor, infectious/inflammatory disease) OR with an abnormal neurological exam148
  • Syncope with clinical concern for seizure or associated neurological signs or symptoms149,150
  • Cyclical vomiting syndrome or abdominal migraine with any localizing neurological symptoms151,152,153
  • Soft tissue mass of the head with nondiagnostic initial evaluation (ultrasound and/or radiograph)154,155,156
  • Psychological changes with neurological deficits on exam or after completion of a full neurological assessment that suggests a possible neurologic cause157
  • Child < 18 years with global developmental delay OR a developmental delay with abnormal neurological examination158,159,160
    • Note: MRI is not recommended as a part of routine evaluation in children with autism spectrum disorder and no other neurologic findings.252
  • Unexplained event (BRUE) formerly apparent life-threatening event (ALTE) in infants

< 1 year with concern for neurological cause based on history and exam161

    • Note: Imaging is not indicated in low-risk patients
  • Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)162
    • For initial workup of BMT (along with CT Chest, CT Sinus and CT Abdomen and Pelvis)

MR Perfusion Imaging163,164,165,166,167

  • Neurovascular disease
    • Assessment of ischemic penumbra in acute stroke
    • Assessment of cerebrovascular reserve
    • Further evaluation of known vascular abnormality (stenosis, malformation, vasospasm, vasculitis, Moya-Moya)
  • Mass lesions
    • Differentiating tumor from tumor mimic
    • Differentiating glioblastoma from brain metastasis
    • Discriminating low- from high-grade gliomas
    • Differentiating recurrent brain tumors from radiation/chemo necrosis
    • Surgical planning

MRI Brain With IAC
(If only images of the IACs is needed w/o Brain imaging see Evolent Clinical Guideline 014 for Sinus, Face, Orbit, Neck and Internal Auditory Canal MRI)

  • Unilateral non-pulsatile tinnitus
  • Pulsatile tinnitus
  • Suspected acoustic neuroma (Schwannoma) or cerebellar pontine angle tumor with any of the following signs and symptoms: unilateral hearing loss by audiometry, headache, disturbed balance or gait, unilateral tinnitus, facial weakness, or altered sense of taste.
  • Suspected cholesteatoma
  • Suspected glomus tumor
  • Asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss on audiogram
  • Congenital/childhood sensorineural hearing loss suspected to be due to a structural abnormality (CNVIII, the brain parenchyma, or the membranous labyrinth).17,168,169 CT is the preferred imaging modality for the osseous anatomy and malformations of the inner ear.
  • CSF otorrhea (MRI/Nuclear Cisternography for intermittent leaks, CT for active leaks);141 there should be a high suspicion or confirmatory CSF fluid laboratory testing (Beta-2 transferrin assay)
  • Clinical suspicion of acute mastoiditis as a complication of acute otitis media with intracranial complications (i.e., meningeal signs, cranial nerve deficits, focal neurological findings, altered mental status)170
  • Bell’s Palsy for evaluation of the extracranial nerve course -if atypical signs, slow resolution beyond three weeks, no improvement at four months, or facial twitching/spasms prior to onset121

Genetics and Rare Diseases

  • MEN1 (Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1) pituitary or sella MRI every 3 – 5 years, starting at the age of 8 – 15 years171,40
  • Von Hippel Lindau (VHL)  imaging of the brain and spinal cord for hemangioblastomas every 2 years starting at age 1440,62,172
  • Li Fraumeni syndrome annually173,174
  • NF-1 as clinically indicated with neurologic signs and symptoms and for follow-up of known intracranial tumors (no asymptomatic screening)
    • Known optic pathway gliomas should be imaged every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months for 2 years, the annually for 3 – 5 years, then less frequently as per clinical judgment until age 18175
  • NF-2 — Brain IAC — annually starting at the age of 10 years176
  • Schwannomatosis  Brain and spine MRI every two to three years beginning at age 12 years.
  • Note: diagnosis is met with both genetic testing AND clinical features due to incomplete penetrance
  • Sturge Weber Syndrome  once after age 1 to rule out intracranial involvement; in patients < 1 year, only if symptomatic177 
  • Turcot Syndrome  low threshold for MRI for any neurological sign or symptoms of medulloblastoma178
  • Tuberous Sclerosis  every 1 – 3 years, until the age of 25 years179
    • Those with asymptomatic subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA) in childhood should continue to be imaged periodically in adulthood.
    • With large or growing SEGA or SEGA causing ventricular enlargement, more frequent brain MRIs as deemed clinically appropriate.
  • Rhabdoid Tumor Predisposition Syndrome  brain MRI at diagnosis and monthly age 0 – 6 months if whole body MRI not done; Q2 – 3 months age 7 – 18 months, Q3months age 19 months – 5 years180
  • Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome (CMMRD)  brain MRI every 6 months after diagnosis
  • Fabrys disease  annual neurologic assessment with brain MRI/MRA every two to three years beginning at age 18 years181
  • X-linked Adrenoleukodystrophy182
    • Baseline MRI between 12 and 18 months old
    • Second MRI 1 year after baseline
    • MRI every 6 months between 3 and 12 years old
    • Annual MRI after 12 years old
  • Heritable retinoblastoma (Pineoblastoma surveillance)
    • Brain MRI at the time of retinoblastoma diagnosis; some centers recommend a brain MRI every 6 months until 5 years old183,184
  • For other syndromes and rare diseases not otherwise addressed in the guideline, coverage is based on a case-by-case basis using societal guidance.

Combination Studies
These body regions might be evaluated separately or in combination as documented in the clinical notes by physical examination findings (e.g., localization to a particular segment of the neuroaxis), patient history, and other available information, including prior imaging.

Note: MRA and CTA are generally comparable noninvasive imaging alternatives each with their own advantages and disadvantages. Brain MRI can alternatively be combined with Brain CTA/Neck CTA.
 

Exception: For approved indications as noted above and being performed in a child under 8 years of age who will need anesthesia for the procedure and there is a suspicion of concurrent intracranial pathology185

Brain MRI/Brain MRA

  • Recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA)186,187
  • Thunderclap headache with continued concern for underlying vascular abnormality (i.e., aneurysm or reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome) after initial negative brain imaging188,189,190,191
    • Note: Negative brain CT < 6 hours after headache onset excludes subarachnoid hemorrhage in neurologically intact patients.190 MRI lacks sensitivity in excluding subarachnoid hemorrhage less than 24 hours after headache onset.188,192
  • Acute, sudden onset of headache with personal history of a vascular abnormality or first-degree family history of aneurysm191,193
  • Headache associated with exercise, exertion, Valsalva or sexual activity4,11,12
  • Suspected venous thrombosis (dural sinus thrombosis)187  Brain MRV  see background
  • Neurological signs or symptoms in sickle cell patients194
  • High stroke risk in sickle cell patients (2  16 years of age) with a transcranial doppler velocity > 20026
  • Known Moyamoya disease195,196 or reversible cerebral vasoconstriction with any new or changing neurological signs or symptoms191,197
  • Suspected secondary CNS vasculitis based on neurological signs or symptoms in the setting of an underlying systemic disease with abnormal inflammatory markers or autoimmune antibodies 193
  • Suspected primary CNS vasculitis based on neurological signs and symptoms with completed infectious/inflammatory lab work-up193,198,199
  • Giant cell arteritis with suspected intracranial involvement93
  • Fabrys disease annual neurologic assessment with brain MRI/MRA every two to three years beginning at age 18 years181

Brain MRI/Brain MRA/Neck MRA

  • Recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA)186,187
  • Suspected carotid or vertebral artery dissection with focal or lateralizing neurological deficits.
  • Pulsatile tinnitus with concern for a suspected arterial vascular and/or intracranial etiology200,201 (Brain MRI should include IAC.)
  • Giant cell arteritis with suspected intracranial and extracranial involvement
  • Approved indications as noted above and being performed in a child under 8 years of age who will need anesthesia for the procedure and there is a suspicion of concurrent intracranial pathology185

Note: CTA and MRA are generally comparable noninvasive imaging alternatives each with their own advantages and disadvantages. Brain MRI can be combined with Brain CTA/Neck CTA.

Brain MRI/Cervical Spine MRI

  • Horner’s syndrome with symptoms localizing the lesion to the central nervous system202

Brain MRI/Cervical Spine MRI/Thoracic Spine MRI (any combination)

  • Combination studies for MS: These body regions might be evaluated separately or in combination as guided by physical examination findings (e.g., localization to a particular segment of the spinal cord), patient history (e.g., symptom(s), time course, and where in the CNS the likely localization(s) is/are), and other available information, including prior imaging.
    • For evaluation of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (recurrent or bilateral optic neuritis; recurrent transverse myelitis)203
    • For known MS, prior to the initiation or change of disease modification treatments and assess disease burden (to establish a new baseline)204,205
    • Follow-up scans, including brain and spine imaging, if patients have known spine disease:
      • 6 – 12 months after starting/changing treatment.
      • Every 1 – 2 years while on disease-modifying therapy to assess for subclinical disease activity, less frequently when stable for 2 – 3 years.

Brain MRI/Cervical Spine MRI/ Thoracic Spine MRI/Lumbar Spine MRI (any combination)

  • For initial evaluation of a suspected Arnold Chiari malformation
  • Follow-up imaging of a known type II or type III Arnold Chiari malformation. For Arnold Chiari type I, follow-up imaging only if new or changing signs/symptoms143,206,207
  • Oncological Applications (e.g., primary nervous system, metastatic)208
    • Drop metastasis from brain or spine209
    • Suspected leptomeningeal carcinomatosis210
  • CSF leak highly suspected and supported by patient history and/or physical exam findings (known or suspected spontaneous (idiopathic) intracranial hypotension (SIH), post lumbar puncture headache, post spinal surgery headache, orthostatic headache, rhinorrhea or otorrhea, or cerebrospinal-venous fistula)
  • For evaluation of known Arnold-Chiari Malformation
  • Tumor evaluation and monitoring in cancer predisposition syndromes
    • Von Hippel Lindau (VHL)  imaging of the brain and spinal cord for hemangioblastomas every 2 years starting at age 1440,62,172
    • Rhabdoid Tumor Predisposition Syndrome  Brain and Spine MRI at diagnosis and monthly age 0 – 6 months if whole body MRI not done; Q2 – 3 months age 7  18 months, Q3 months age 19 months – 5 years.
    • NF-2  Brain IAC — annually starting at the age of 10 years and spinal imaging at baseline and every 2 to 3 years with more frequent imaging, if warranted, based on sites of tumor involvement176
    • Schwannomatosis - Brain and spine MRI every two to three years beginning at age 12 years211

Note: diagnosis is met with both genetic testing AND clinical features due to incomplete penetrance.

Brain/Cervical/Thoracic/Lumbar/Abdomen MRI

  • Von Hippel Lindau (VHL) every 2 years starting at age 15

Brain MRI and Face/Sinus MRI

  • Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s granulomatosis) disease212
  • Trigeminal neuralgia or neuropathy with an atypical presentation (for evaluation of the extracranial nerve course)121 (See background.)
  • For approved indications as noted above and being performed in a child under 8 years of age who will need anesthesia for the procedure and there is a suspicion of concurrent intracranial pathology185

Brain MRI and Orbit MRI

  • Optic neuropathy or unilateral optic disk swelling of unclear etiology to distinguish between a compressive lesion of the optic nerve, optic neuritis, ischemic optic neuropathy (arteritic or non-arteritic), central retinal vein occlusion or optic nerve infiltrative disorders19,213
  • Bilateral optic disk swelling (papilledema) with visual loss19,214,215,216
  • Optic Neuritis214,215,217
    • If atypical presentation (bilateral, absence of pain, optic nerve hemorrhages, severe visual impairment, lack of response to steroids, poor recovery or recurrence)
    • If needed to confirm optic neuritis and rule out compressive lesions
  • Known or suspected neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder with severe, recurrent, or bilateral optic neuritis203
  • Suspected retinoblastoma218,219

Chest CT (or MRI) and Brain/Abdomen/Pelvis MRI

  • Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Syndrome Type 1 (MEN-1)
    • Chest/Abdomen/Pelvis annually
    • Brain/Chest/Abdomen/Pelvis every 3 years

Sinus/Chest/Abdomen and Pelvis CT and Brain MRI

  • Prior to Bone Marrow Transplantation

Combination Studies for Malignancy for Initial Staging or Restaging
Unless otherwise specified in this guideline, indication for combination studies for malignancy for initial staging or restaging:

  • Concurrent studies to include CT or MRI of any of the following areas as appropriate depending on the cancer: Abdomen, Brain, Chest, Neck, Pelvis, Cervical Spine, Thoracic Spine or Lumbar Spine.

References 

  1. Holle D, Obermann M. The role of neuroimaging in the diagnosis of headache disorders. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. Nov 2013; 6: 369-74. 10.1177/1756285613489765.
  2. Quinones-Hinojosa A, Gulati M, Singh V, Lawton M. Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage due to coagulation disorders. Neurosurg Focus. Oct 15, 2003; 15: E3. 10.3171/foc.2003.15.4.3.
  3. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Headache. 2022; 2023:
  4. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. Jan 2018; 38: 1-211. 10.1177/0333102417738202.
  5. Micieli A, Kingston W. An Approach to Identifying Headache Patients That Require Neuroimaging. Front Public Health. 2019; 7: 52. 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00052.
  6. Mitsikostas D D, Ashina M, Craven A, Diener H C, Goadsby P J et al. European Headache Federation consensus on technical investigation for primary headache disorders. J Headache Pain. 2016; 17: 5. 10.1186/s10194-016-0596-y.
  7. Hamilton K. Secondary Headaches During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period. Practical Neurology. May 2020; 2023:
  8. Shobeiri E, Torabinejad B. Brain magnetic resonance imaging findings in postpartum headache. Neuroradiol J. Feb 2019; 32: 4-9. 10.1177/1971400918804193.
  9. Nahas S. New Guidelines on Headache Imaging. January 8, 2020; 2023:
  10. Togha M, Karimitafti M, Ghorbani Z, Farham F, Naderi-Behdani F et al. Characteristics and comorbidities of headache in patients over 50 years of age: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatrics. 2022/04/10; 22: 313. 10.1186/s12877-022-03027-1.
  11. González-Quintanilla V, Madera J, Pascual J. Update on headaches associated with physical exertion. Cephalalgia. 2023; 43: true. 10.1177/03331024221146989.
  12. Ray J, Hutton E. Imaging in headache disorders. Australian prescriber. 2022; 45: 88-92.
  13. Kuruvilla D, Lipton R. Appropriate use of neuroimaging in headache. Curr Pain Headache Rep. Jun 2015; 19: 17. 10.1007/s11916-015-0490-3.
  14. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria: Headache - Child. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2018; 15: S78 - S90. 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.017.
  15. Trofimova A, Vey B, Mullins M, Wolf D, Kadom N. Imaging of Children with Nontraumatic Headaches. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jan 2018; 210: 8-17. 10.2214/ajr.17.18561.
  16. Gofshteyn J, Stephenson D. Diagnosis and Management of Childhood Headache. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. Feb 2016; 46: 36-51. 10.1016/j.cppeds.2015.11.003.
  17. Sharma A, Kirsch C F, Aulino J M, Chakraborty S, Choudhri A F et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria: Hearing Loss and/or Vertigo. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2018; 15: S321 - S331. 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.09.020.
  18. ACR. American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria: Altered Mental Status, Coma, Delirium and Psychosis. 2024.
  19. Kennedy T A, Corey A S, Policeni B, Agarwal V, Burns J et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria: Orbits, Vision, and Visual Loss. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2018; 15: S116 - S131. 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.023.
  20. ACR. American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria: Dizziness and Ataxia. 2023.
  1. Harvey H B, Watson L C, Subramaniam R M, Burns J, Bykowski J et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria: Movement Disorders and Neurodegenerative Diseases. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2020; 17: S175 - S187. 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.01.042.
  2. Wippold F 2. Focal neurologic deficit. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Nov 2008; 29: 1998-2000.
  3. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria: Cerebrovascular Disease-Child. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2020; 17: S36 - S54. 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.01.036.
  4. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria: Cerebrovascular Diseases - Stroke and Stroke-Related Conditions. 2023.
  5. Powers W J, Rabinstein A A, Ackerson T, Adeoye O M, Bambakidis N C et al. 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018; 49: e46 - e99. 10.1161/STR.0000000000000158.
  6. DeBaun M, Jordan L, King A, Schatz J, Vichinsky E et al. American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for sickle cell disease: prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cerebrovascular disease in children and adults. Blood Adv. Apr 28, 2020; 4: 1554-1588. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019001142.
  7. Thust S, Burke C, Siddiqui A. Neuroimaging findings in sickle cell disease. Br J Radiol. Aug 2014; 87: 20130699. 10.1259/bjr.20130699.
  8. Sheehan V, Hansbury E, Smeltzer M, Fortner G, McCarville M. Transcranial Doppler velocity and brain MRI/MRA changes in children with sickle cell anemia on chronic transfusions to prevent primary stroke. Pediatr Blood Cancer. Sep 2013; 60: 1499-502. 10.1002/pbc.24569.
  9. Ledbetter L N, Burns J, Shih R Y, Ajam A A, Brown M D et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria: Cerebrovascular Diseases-Aneurysm, Vascular Malformation, and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2021; 18: S283 - S304. 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.012.
  10. Bushnell C, Saposnik G. Evaluation and management of cerebral venous thrombosis. Continuum (Minneap Minn). Apr 2014; 20: 335-51. 10.1212/01.CON.0000446105.67173.a8.
  11. Akers A, Al-Shahi Salman R, I A A, Dahlem K, Flemming K et al. Synopsis of Guidelines for the Clinical Management of Cerebral Cavernous Malformations: Consensus Recommendations Based on Systematic Literature Review by the Angioma Alliance Scientific Advisory Board Clinical Experts Panel. Neurosurgery. May 1, 2017; 80: 665-680. 10.1093/neuros/nyx091.
  12. Velz J, Stienen M, Neidert M, Yang Y, Regli L. Routinely Performed Serial Follow-Up Imaging in Asymptomatic Patients with Multiple Cerebral Cavernous Malformations Has No Influence on Surgical Decision Making. Front Neurol. 2018; 9: 848. 10.3389/fneur.2018.00848.
  13. Zyck S, Gould G. Cavernous Venous Malformation. StatPearls. May 9, 2022; 2023:
  14. Polinder S, Cnossen M C, Real R G L, Covic A, Gorbunova A et al. A Multidimensional Approach to Post-concussion Symptoms in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Front Neurol. 2018; 9: 1113. 10.3389/fneur.2018.01113.
  15. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Head Trauma. 2020; 2023:
  16. Panwar J, Hsu C, Tator C, Mikulis D. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Criteria for Post-Concussion Syndrome: A Study of 127 Post-Concussion Syndrome Patients. J Neurotrauma. May 15, 2020; 37: 1190-1196. 10.1089/neu.2019.6809.
  17. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines): Central Nervous System Cancers Version 2.2022. September 29, 2022; 2023:
  18. Molitch M. Diagnosis and Treatment of Pituitary Adenomas: A Review. JAMA. 2017; 317: 516- 524.
  1. Burns J, Policeni B, Bykowski J, Dubey P, Germano I et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Neuroendocrine Imaging. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2019; 16: S161 - S173. 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.017.
  2. NCCN. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Tumors Version 1.2023. National Comprehensive Cancer Network®. 2023; Accessed May 2024:
  3. Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of growth hormone (GH) deficiency in childhood and adolescence: summary statement of the GH Research Society. GH Research Society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Nov 2000; 85: 3990-3. 10.1210/jcem.85.11.6984.
  4. Kannan S, Kennedy L. Diagnosis of acromegaly: state of the art. Expert Opin Med Diagn. Sep 2013; 7: 443-53. 10.1517/17530059.2013.820181.
  5. Majumdar A, Mangal N. Hyperprolactinemia. J Hum Reprod Sci. Jul 2013; 6: 168-75. 10.4103/0974-1208.121400.
  6. Bhasin S, Brito J, Cunningham G, Hayes F, Hodis H et al. Testosterone Therapy in Men with Hypogonadism: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. May 1, 2018; 103: 1715-1744. 10.1210/jc.2018-00229.
  7. P. D, N.P. V. Dexamethasone Suppression Test. Aug 8, 2022; 2023:
  8. L.K. N. Recent Updates on the Diagnosis and Management of Cushings Syndrome. Endocrinol Metab. 2018; 33: 139-146.
  9. Bonneville J, Potorac I, Petrossians P, Tshibanda L, Beckers A. Pituitary MRI in Cushings disease - an update. Journal of Neuroendocrinology. 2022; 34: e13123. https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.13123.
  10. Melmed S, Casanueva F F, Hoffman A R, Kleinberg D L, Montori V M et al. Diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011; 96: 273-88. 10.1210/jc.2010-1692.
  11. Vilar L, Vilar C, Lyra R, Freitas M. Pitfalls in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Hyperprolactinemia. Neuroendocrinology. 2019; 109: 7-19. 10.1159/000499694.
  12. Faizah M, Zuhanis A, Rahmah R, Raja A, Wu L et al. Precocious puberty in children: A review of imaging findings. Biomed Imaging Interv J. Jan 2012; 8: e6. 10.2349/biij.8.1.e6.
  13. Go R, Jacobsen E, Baiocchi R, Buhtoiarov I, Butler E et al. Histiocytic Neoplasms, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. Nov 2021; 19: 1277-1303. 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0053.
  14. Goyal G, Young J, Koster M, Tobin W, Vassallo R et al. The Mayo Clinic Histiocytosis Working Group Consensus Statement for the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Adult Patients with Histiocytic Neoplasms: Erdheim-Chester Disease, Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis, and Rosai-Dorfman Disease. Mayo Clin Proc. Oct 2019; 94: 2054-2071. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.02.023.
  15. Petersenn S, Fleseriu M, Casanueva F, Giustina A, Biermasz N et al. Diagnosis and management of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas: a Pituitary Society international Consensus Statement. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. 2023; 19: 722 - 740. 10.1038/s41574-023-00886-5.
  16. Banskota S, Adamson D. Pituitary Adenomas: From Diagnosis to Therapeutics. 2021; 9: 10.3390/biomedicines9050494.
  17. Jenkinson M, Mills S, Mallucci C, Santarius T. Management of pineal and colloid cysts. Practical Neurology. 2021; 21: true. 10.1136/practneurol-2020-002838.
  1. Petersson M, Berinder K, Eden Engström B, Tsatsaris E, Ekman B et al. Natural history and surgical outcome of Rathke’s cleft cysts—A study from the Swedish Pituitary Registry. Clinical Endocrinology. 2022; 96: 54-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.14622.
  2. Jafrani R, Raskin J, Kaufman A, Lam S. Intracranial arachnoid cysts: Pediatric neurosurgery update. Surg Neurol Int. 2019; 10: 15. 10.4103/sni.sni_320_18.
  3. Mustansir F, Bashir S, Darbar A. Management of Arachnoid Cysts: A Comprehensive Review. Cureus. Apr 10, 2018; 10: e2458. 10.7759/cureus.2458.
  4. Buncke M, Lilly G, Hamilton B, MacArthur C. When is pre-operative imaging required for craniofacial dermoid cysts/sinuses? A. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2022; 155: 111090.
  5. Orozco-Covarrubias L, Lara-Carpio R, Saez-De-Ocariz M, Duran-McKinster C, Palacios-Lopez C. Dermoid cysts: a report of 75 pediatric patients. Pediatric dermatology. 2013; 30: 706-11.
  6. Choi J, Bae Y, Lee J, Kang G. Dermoid cysts: Epidemiology and diagnostic approach based on clinical. Archives of plastic surgery. 2018; 45: 512-516.
  7. NCCN. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Kidney Cancer Version 4.2023. National Comprehensive Cancer Network®. 2023; 2023:
  8. NCCN. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Version 3.2023. National Comprehensive Cancer Network®. 2023.
  9. NCCN. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Small Cell Lung Cancer Version 3.2023. National Comprehensive Cancer Network®. 2023.
  10. NCCN. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Head and Neck Cancers Version 2.2023. National Comprehensive Cancer Network®. 2023.
  11. NCCN. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Melanoma: Cutaneous Version 2.2023. National Comprehensive Cancer Network®. 2023.
  12. NCCN. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Tumors Version 1.2024. National Comprehensive Cancer Network®. 2024.
  13. NCCN. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia Version 1.2024. National Comprehensive Cancer Network®. 2024.
  14. NCCN. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Acute Myeloid Leukemia Version 4.2023. National Comprehensive Cancer Network®. 2023.
  15. NCCN. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Version 2.2023. National Comprehensive Cancer Network®. 2023.
  16. NCCN. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Version 1.2024. National Comprehensive Cancer Network®. 2024.
  17. NCCN. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Breast Cancer Version 4.2023. National Comprehensive Cancer Network®. 2023.
  18. NCCN. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): B-Cell Lymphomas Version 2.2023. National Comprehensive Cancer Network®. 2023.
  19. NCCN. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Cervical Cancer Version 1.2024. National Comprehensive Cancer Network®. 2024.
  20. NCCN. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Central Nervous System Cancers Version 1.2023. National Comprehensive Cancer Network®. 2023.
  1. Hourani R, Nasreddine W, Dirani M, Hmaimess G, Sabbagh S et al. When Should a Brain MRI Be Performed in Children with New-Onset Seizures? Results of a Large Prospective Trial. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2021; 42: 1695-1701. 10.3174/ajnr.A7193.
  2. Lee R K, Burns J, Ajam A A, Broder J S, Chakraborty S et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria: Seizures and Epilepsy. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2020; 17: S293 - S304. 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.01.037.
  3. Trofimova A, Milla S S, Ryan M E, Pruthi S, Blount J P et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria: Seizures-Child. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2021; 18: S199 - S211. 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.02.020.
  4. Ho K, Lawn N, Bynevelt M, Lee J, Dunne J. Neuroimaging of first-ever seizure: Contribution of MRI if CT is normal. Neurol Clin Pract. Oct 2013; 3: 398-403. 10.1212/CPJ.0b013e3182a78f25.
  5. Krumholz A, Wiebe S, Gronseth G, Shinnar S, Levisohn P et al. Practice Parameter: evaluating an apparent unprovoked first seizure in adults (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society. Neurology. Nov 20, 2007; 69: 1996-2007. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000285084.93652.43.
  6. Ramli N, Rahmat K, Lim K, Tan C. Neuroimaging in refractory epilepsy. Current practice and evolving trends. Eur J Radiol. Sep 2015; 84: 1791-800. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.03.024.
  7. Hirtz D, Ashwal S, Berg A, Bettis D, Camfield C et al. Practice parameter: evaluating a first nonfebrile seizure in children: report of the quality standards subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, The Child Neurology Society, and The American Epilepsy Society. Neurology. Sep 12, 2000; 55: 616-23. 10.1212/wnl.55.5.616.
  8. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Seizures and Epilepsy. 2019; 2023:
  9. Bernasconi A, Cendes F, Theodore W, Gill R, Koepp M et al. Recommendations for the use of structural magnetic resonance imaging in the care of patients with epilepsy: A consensus report from the International League Against Epilepsy Neuroimaging Task Force. Epilepsia. Jun 2019; 60: 1054- 1068. 10.1111/epi.15612.
  10. Thompson A J, Banwell B L, Barkhof F, Carroll W M, Coetzee T et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2018; 17: 162-173. 10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30470-2.
  11. Wattjes M P, Ciccarelli O, Reich D S, Banwell B, de Stefano N et al. 2021 MAGNIMS-CMSC- NAIMS consensus recommendations on the use of MRI in patients with Multiple Sclerosis. The Lancet. Neurology. 2021; 20: 653-670.
  12. Rae-Grant A, Day G S, Marrie R A, Rabinstein A, Cree B A C et al. Practice guideline recommendations summary: Disease-modifying therapies for adults with multiple sclerosis: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2018; 90: 777-788. 10.1212/wnl.0000000000005347.
  13. Amato M, De Stefano N, Inglese M, Morena E, Ristori G et al. Secondary Prevention in Radiologically Isolated Syndromes and Prodromal Stages of Multiple Sclerosis. Frontiers in Neurology. 2022-March-14; 13: 10.3389/fneur.2022.787160.
  14. McGuigan C, Craner M, Guadagno J, Kapoor R, Mazibrada G et al. Stratification and monitoring of natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy risk: recommendations from an expert group. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Feb 2016; 87: 117-25. 10.1136/jnnp-2015-311100.
  15. Saberi A, Roudbary S, Ghayeghran A, Kazemi S, Hosseininezhad M. Diagnosis of Meningitis Caused by Pathogenic Microorganisms Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review. BCN. 2018; 9: 73 - 86. 10.29252/nirp.bcn.9.2.73.
  1. Oliveira C, Morriss M, Mistrot J, Cantey J, Doern C. Brain magnetic resonance imaging of infants with bacterial meningitis. J Pediatr. Jul 2014; 165: 134-9. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.02.061.
  2. D'Souza N, Morgan M, Almarzouqi S, Lee A. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in giant cell arteritis. Eye (Lond). May 2016; 30: 758-62. 10.1038/eye.2016.19.
  3. Maz M, Chung S A, Abril A, Langford C A, Gorelik M et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Giant Cell Arteritis and Takayasu Arteritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2021; 73: 1071 - 1087. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.24632.
  4. Yip A, Jernberg E T, Bardi M, Geiger J, Lohne F et al. Magnetic resonance imaging compared to ultrasonography in giant cell arteritis: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020; 22: 247. 10.1186/s13075-020-02335-4.
  5. Diamantopoulos A, Haugeberg G, Hetland H, Soldal D, Bie R. Diagnostic value of color Doppler ultrasonography of temporal arteries and large vessels in giant cell arteritis: a consecutive case series. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). Jan 2014; 66: 113-9. 10.1002/acr.22178.
  6. Agarwal S, Sebastian L J D, Gaikwad S, Srivastava M V P, Sharma M C et al. The role of susceptibility-weighted imaging and contrast-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis of primary CNS vasculitis: a large case series. Scientific Reports. 2024; 14: true. 10.1038/s41598-024-55222-2.
  7. Godasi R, Pang G, Chauhan S, Bollu P. Primary Central Nervous System Vasculitis. StatPearls. October 12, 2022; 2023:
  8. Edjlali M, Qiao Y, Boulouis G, Menjot N, Saba L et al. Vessel wall MR imaging for the detection of intracranial inflammatory. Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy. 2020; 10: 1108-1119.
  9. Kartau M, Sipilä J O, Auvinen E, Palomäki M, Verkkoniemi-Ahola A. Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy: Current Insights. Degenerative neurological and neuromuscular disease. 2019; 9: 109-121.
  10. Pjanic M, Aleckovic-Halilovic M, Basic-Jukic N. JC Virus in Kidney Transplant Population: Are We Cautious Enough? Journal of clinical medicine. 2024; 13:
  11. Pavlovic D, Patera A, Nyberg F, Gerber M, Liu M. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: current treatment options and future. Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders. 2015; 8: 255- 73.
  12. Voortman M, Drent M, Baughman R. Management of neurosarcoidosis: a clinical challenge. Curr Opin Neurol. Jun 2019; 32: 475-483. 10.1097/wco.0000000000000684.
  13. Fritz D, van de Beek D, Brouwer M. Clinical features, treatment and outcome in neurosarcoidosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Neurol. Nov 15, 2016; 16: 220. 10.1186/s12883-016-0741-x.
  14. Harvey P. Clinical applications of neuropsychological assessment. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. Mar 2012; 14: 91-9. 10.31887/DCNS.2012.14.1/pharvey.
  15. Health Quality Ontario. The appropriate use of neuroimaging in the diagnostic work-up of dementia: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2014; 14: 1-64.
  16. Narayanan L, Murray A. What can imaging tell us about cognitive impairment and dementia? World J Radiol. Mar 28, 2016; 8: 240-54. 10.4329/wjr.v8.i3.240.
  17. McCollum L, Karlawish J. Cognitive Impairment Evaluation and Management. The Medical clinics of North America. 2020; 104: 807-825.
  18. Carpenter C, Bassett E, Fischer G, Shirshekan J, Galvin J. Four sensitive screening tools to detect cognitive dysfunction in geriatric emergency department patients: brief Alzheimer’s Screen, Short Blessed Test, Ottawa 3DY, and the caregiver-completed AD8. Acad Emerg Med. Apr 2011; 18: 374-84. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01040.x.
  1. McDougall G. A review of screening instruments for assessing cognition and mental status in older adults. Nurse Pract. Nov 1990; 15: 18-28.
  2. US Food & Drug Administration. Reference ID: 5105416 Full Prescribing Information - Leqembi (lecanemab-imrb). 2023.
  3. Wu W, Ji Y, Wang Z, Wu X, Li J et al. The FDA-approved anti-amyloid-β monoclonal antibodies

for the treatment of. European journal of medical research. 2023; 28: 544.

  1. McFarland N. Diagnostic Approach to Atypical Parkinsonian Syndromes. Continuum (Minneap Minn). Aug 2016; 22: 1117-42. 10.1212/con.0000000000000348.
  2. Pyatigorskaya N, Gallea C, Garcia-Lorenzo D, Vidailhet M, Lehericy S. A review of the use of magnetic resonance imaging in Parkinsons disease. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2014; 7: 206-20. 10.1177/1756285613511507.
  3. Sharifi S, Nederveen A, Booij J, van Rootselaar A. Neuroimaging essentials in essential tremor: a systematic review. Neuroimage Clin. 2014; 5: 217-31. 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.05.003.
  4. Albanese A, Asmus F, Bhatia K, Elia A, Elibol B et al. EFNS guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of primary dystonias. Eur J Neurol. Jan 2011; 18: 5-18. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03042.x.
  5. Comella CL, National Organization for Rare Disorders. Cervical Dystonia. 2019; 2023:
  6. Iliescu D, Timaru C, Alexe N, Gosav E, De Simone A et al. Management of diplopia. Rom J Ophthalmol. Jul-Sep 2017; 61: 166-170. 10.22336/rjo.2017.31.
  7. American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Five things physicians and patients should question: Don’t routinely order neuro-imaging for all patients with double vision. May 29, 2019; 2023:
  8. Yoon L, Kim H, Kwak M, Park K, Bae M et al. Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Children with Strabismus. J Child Neurol. Sep 2019; 34: 574-581. 10.1177/0883073819846807.
  9. Sadaka A, Schockman S, Golnik K. Evaluation of Horner Syndrome in the MRI Era. Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology. 2017; 37:
  10. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Cranial Neuropathy. 2022; 2023:
  11. Bendtsen L, Zakrzewska J, Abbott J, Braschinsky M, Di Stefano G et al. European Academy of Neurology guideline on trigeminal neuralgia. Eur J Neurol. Jun 2019; 26: 831-849. 10.1111/ene.13950.
  12. Cruccu G, Finnerup N, Jensen T, Scholz J, Sindou M et al. Trigeminal neuralgia: New classification and diagnostic grading for practice and research. Neurology. Jul 12, 2016; 87: 220-8. 10.1212/wnl.0000000000002840.
  13. Choi I, Jeon S. Neuralgias of the Head: Occipital Neuralgia. J Korean Med Sci. Apr 2016; 31: 479-88. 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.4.479.
  14. Warner M, Hutchison J, Varacallo M. Bell Palsy. Statpearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. Updated 2023 Aug 17.
  15. Hohman M, Hadlock T. Etiology, diagnosis, and management of facial palsy: 2000 patients at a facial. The Laryngoscope. 2014; 124: E283-93.
  16. Mumtaz S, Jensen M. Facial neuropathy with imaging enhancement of the facial nerve: a case report. Future Neurol. Nov 1, 2014; 9: 571-576. 10.2217/fnl.14.55.
  1. Yedavalli V, Patil A, Shah P. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and its Mimics/Variants: A Comprehensive Review. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2018; 8: 53. 10.4103/jcis.JCIS_40_18.
  2. King R, Reiss J. The epidemiology and pathophysiology of pseudobulbar affect and its association with neurodegeneration. Degener Neurol Neuromuscul Dis. 2013; 3: 23-31. 10.2147/dnnd.S34160.
  3. Tan A, Mankad K, Gonçalves F, Talenti G, Alexia E. Macrocephaly: Solving the Diagnostic Dilemma. Top Magn Reson Imaging. Aug 2018; 27: 197-217. 10.1097/rmr.0000000000000170.
  4. Hanzlik E, Gigante J. Microcephaly. 2017; 4: 10.3390/children4060047.
  5. Kim H, Roh H, Lee I. Craniosynostosis: Updates in Radiologic Diagnosis. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society. 2016; 59: 10.3340/jkns.2016.59.3.219.
  6. Rossi A, Argyropoulou M, Zlatareva D, Boulouis G, Pizzini F et al. European recommendations on practices in pediatric neuroradiology: consensus document from the European Society of Neuroradiology (ESNR), European Society of Paediatric Radiology (ESPR) and European Union of Medical Specialists Division of Neuroradiology (UEMS). Pediatric Radiology. 2023; 53: 159 - 168. 10.1007/s00247-022-05479-4.
  7. Kubota T, Adachi M, Kitaoka T, Hasegawa K, Ohata Y et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Achondroplasia. Clin Pediatr Endocrinol. 2020; 29: 25-42. 10.1297/cpe.29.25.
  8. Cerebral palsy in under 25s: assessment and management. January 25, 2017; 2023:
  9. National Organization for Rare Disorders. Chiari Malformations. 2014; 2023:
  10. Whitson W, Lane J, Bauer D, Durham S. A prospective natural history study of nonoperatively managed Chiari I malformation: does follow-up MRI surveillance alter surgical decision making? J Neurosurg Pediatr. Aug 2015; 16: 159-66. 10.3171/2014.12.Peds14301.
  11. Damasceno B. Neuroimaging in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Neuropsychol. Oct- Dec 2015; 9: 350-355. 10.1590/1980-57642015dn94000350.
  12. Khalatbari H, Parisi M. Management of Hydrocephalus in Children: Anatomic Imaging Appearances of CSF Shunts and Their Complications. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2020; 216: 187 - 199. 10.2214/AJR.20.22888.
  13. Severson M, Strecker-McGraw M. Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak. StatPearls. August 8, 2022; 2023:
  14. Hiremath S, Gautam A, Sasindran V, Therakathu J, Benjamin G. Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea and otorrhea: A multimodality imaging approach. Diagn Interv Imaging. Jan 2019; 100: 3-15. 10.1016/j.diii.2018.05.003.
  15. Deline C, Schievink WI , National Organization for Rare Disorders. Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension. September 1, 2020; 2023:
  16. Mohammad S, Osman N, Ahmed K. The value of CSF flow studies in the management of CSF disorders in children: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. Jan 28, 2019; 10: 3. 10.1186/s13244-019- 0686-x.
  17. BR G, Sharma P K, Polaka Y, S P, Natarajan P. The Role of Phase-Contrast MRI in Diagnosing Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow. Cureus. 2024; 16: e57114.
  18. Newman-Toker D E, Kerber K A, Hsieh Y, Pula J H, Omron R et al. HINTS outperforms ABCD2 to screen for stroke in acute continuous vertigo and. Academic emergency medicine: official journal of the Society for Academic. 2013; 20: 986-96.
  19. Ohle R, Montpellier R, Marchadier V, Wharton A, McIsaac S et al. Can Emergency Physicians Accurately Rule Out a Central Cause of Vertigo Using the. Academic emergency medicine: official journal of the Society for Academic. 2020; 27: 887-896.
  1. Felix O, Amaddeo A, Olmo Arroyo J, Zerah M, Puget S et al. Central sleep apnea in children: experience at a single center. Sleep Med. Sep 2016; 25: 24-28. 10.1016/j.sleep.2016.07.016.
  2. Regn D D, Davis A H, Smith W D, Blasser C J, Ford C M. Central Sleep Apnea in Adults: Diagnosis and Treatment. Federal practitioner: for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS. 2023; 40: 78-86.
  3. Brignole M, Moya A, de Lange F, Deharo J, Elliott P et al. 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39: 1883 - 1948. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy037.
  4. Hatharasinghe A, Etebar K, Wolsky R, Akhondi H, Ayutyanont N. An Assessment of the Diagnostic Value in Syncope Workup: A Retrospective Study. HCA healthcare journal of medicine. 2021; 2: 423-431.
  5. Raucci U, Borrelli O, Di Nardo G, Tambucci R, Pavone P et al. Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome in Children. Frontiers in Neurology. 2020; 11:
  6. Venkatesan T, Levinthal D J, Tarbell S E, Jaradeh S S, Hasler W L et al. Guidelines on management of cyclic vomiting syndrome in adults by the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome Association. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019; 31 Suppl 2: e13604. 10.1111/nmo.13604.
  7. Angus-Leppan H, Saatci D, Sutcliffe A, Guiloff R. Abdominal migraine. Bmj. Feb 19, 2018; 360: k179. 10.1136/bmj. k179.
  8. Garner H, Wessell D, Lenchik L, Ahlawat S, Baker J et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Soft Tissue Masses: 2022 Update. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2023; 20: S234 - S245. 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.02.009.
  9. Zhang J, Li Y, Zhao Y, Qiao J. CT and MRI of superficial solid tumors. Quant Imaging Med Surg. Mar 2018; 8: 232-251. 10.21037/qims.2018.03.03.
  10. Kim H, An J, Woo J, Yoon R. Superficially Palpable Masses of the Scalp and Face: A Pictorial Essay. Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology. 2019; 80: 283-293.
  11. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Mental Status Change, Delirium, and New Onset Psychosis. 2018; 2023:
  12. Ali A S, Syed N P, Murthy G S, Nori M, Abkari A et al. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of developmental delay in pediatric patients. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9: Tc21-4. 10.7860/jcdr/2015/11921.5478.
  13. Randhawa H, Bagale S, Umap R, Randhawa J. Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Evaluation of Pediatric Patients With. Cureus. 2022; 14: e24051.
  14. Momen A, Jelodar G, Dehdashti H. Brain magnetic resonance imaging findings in developmentally delayed children. Int J Pediatr. 2011; 2011: 386984. 10.1155/2011/386984.
  15. Tieder J, Bonkowsky J, Etzel R, Franklin W, Gremse D et al. Brief Resolved Unexplained Events (Formerly Apparent Life-Threatening Events) and Evaluation of Lower-Risk Infants: Executive Summary. Pediatrics. May 2016; 137: 10.1542/peds.2016-0591.
  16. Gerull S, Medinger M, Heim D, Passweg J, Stern M. Evaluation of the Pretransplantation Workup before Allogeneic Transplantation. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2014; 20: 1852 - 1856. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.06.029.
  17. Arevalo-Perez J, Peck K, Young R, Holodny A, Karimi S. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Grading of Gliomas. J Neuroimaging. Sep-Oct 2015; 25: 792-8. 10.1111/jon.12239.
  1. Metaweh N, Azab A, El Basmy A, Mashhour K, El Mahdy W. Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging to Differentiate Between Recurrent/Residual Brain Neoplasms and Radiation Necrosis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. Apr 25, 2018; 19: 941-948. 10.22034/apjcp.2018.19.4.941.
  2. Radiology A C o. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® ACR-ASNR-SPR Practice Parameter for the Performance of Intracranial Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging. 2022; 2023: Resolution 24.
  3. Wang L, Wei L, Wang J, Li N, Gao Y et al. Evaluation of perfusion MRI value for tumor progression assessment after glioma radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). Dec 24, 2020; 99: e23766. 10.1097/md.0000000000023766.
  4. Suh C, Kim H, Jung S, Choi C, Kim S. Perfusion MRI as a diagnostic biomarker for differentiating glioma from brain metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. Sep 2018; 28:3819-3831. 10.1007/s00330-018-5335-0.
  5. O'Brien W, D'Arco F, Onofrj V, Koch B. Nonsyndromic Congenital Causes of Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Children: An Illustrative Review. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2021; 216: 1048 - 1055. 10.2214/AJR.20.23160.
  6. Joshi V, Navlekar S, Kishore G, Reddy K, Kumar E. CT and MR imaging of the inner ear and brain in children with congenital sensorineural hearing loss. Radiographics. May-Jun 2012; 32: 683-98. 10.1148/rg.323115073.
  7. Platzek I, Kitzler H, Gudziol V, Laniado M, Hahn G. Magnetic resonance imaging in acute mastoiditis. Acta Radiol Short Rep. Feb 2014; 3: 2047981614523415. 10.1177/2047981614523415.
  8. Thompson R, Landry C. Multiple endocrine neoplasia 1: a broad overview. Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease. 2021; 12: true. 10.1177/20406223211035288.
  9. Rednam S, Erez A, Druker H, Janeway K, Kamihara J et al. Von Hippel-Lindau and Hereditary Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma Syndromes: Clinical Features, Genetics, and Surveillance Recommendations in Childhood. Clin Cancer Res. Jun 15, 2017; 23: e68-e75. 10.1158/1078- 0432.Ccr-17-0547.
  10. Kumar P, Gill R, Phelps A, Tulpule A, Matthay K. Surveillance Screening in Li-Fraumeni Syndrome: Raising Awareness of False Positives. Cureus. Apr 24, 2018; 10: e2527. 10.7759/cureus.2527.
  11. Schneider K, Zelley K, Nichols K, et al. Li-Fraumeni Syndrome. GeneReviews [Internet]. 2019; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1311/.
  12. de Blank P M K, Fisher M J, Liu G T, Gutmann D H, Listernick R et al. Optic Pathway Gliomas in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: An Update: Surveillance. Journal of neuro-ophthalmology: the official journal of the North American. 2017; 37 Suppl 1: S23-S32.
  13. Evans D, Salvador H, Chang V, Erez A, Voss S et al. Cancer and Central Nervous System Tumor Surveillance in Pediatric Neurofibromatosis 2 and Related Disorders. Clin Cancer Res. Jun 15, 2017; 23: e54-e61. 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-17-0590.
  14. Yeom S, Comi A. Updates on Sturge-Weber Syndrome. Stroke. 2022; 53: 3769 - 3779. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.038585.
  15. Khattab A, Monga D. Turcot Syndrome. StatPearls [Internet]. 2023.
  16. Northrup H, Aronow M, Bebin E, Bissler J, Darling T et al. Updated International Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Diagnostic Criteria and Surveillance and Management Recommendations. Pediatric Neurology. 2021; 123: 50 - 66. 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2021.07.011.
  17. Nemes K, Bens S, Bourdeaut F, et al. Rhabdoid Tumor Predisposition Syndrome. GeneReviews [Internet]. 2022.
  1. Mehta A, Hughes D A. Fabry Disease. [Accessed 24 May 2024]. GeneReviews (®). 1993.
  2. Mallack E, Turk B, Yan H, Price C, Demetres M et al. MRI surveillance of boys with X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy identified by newborn screening: Meta-analysis and consensus guidelines. J Inherit Metab Dis. May 2021; 44: 728-739. 10.1002/jimd.12356.
  3. Kamihara J, Bourdeaut F, Foulkes W, Molenaar J, Mossé Y et al. Retinoblastoma and Neuroblastoma Predisposition and Surveillance. Clin Cancer Res. Jul 1, 2017; 23: e98-e106. 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-17-0652.
  4. Grasparil A, Gottumukkala R, Greer M, Gee M. Whole-Body MRI Surveillance of Cancer Predisposition Syndromes: Current Best Practice Guidelines for Use, Performance, and Interpretation. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2020/10/01; 215: 1002-1011. 10.2214/AJR.19.22399.
  5. Lawson G. Controversy: Sedation of children for magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Dis Child. Feb 2000; 82: 150-3. 10.1136/adc.82.2.150.
  6. Kleindorfer D, Towfighi A, Chaturvedi S, Cockroft K , Gutierrez J et al. 2021 Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2021; 52: e364-e467. 10.1161/STR.0000000000000375.
  7. Pannell J, Corey A, Shih R , Austin M, Chu S et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Cerebrovascular Diseases-Stroke and Stroke-Related Conditions. J Am Coll Radiol. 2023.
  8. International Headache Society. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018; 38: 1-211. 10.1177/0333102417738202.
  9. Hayes L, Palasis S, Bartel T, Booth T, Iyer R et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Headache- Child. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018; 15: S78-S90. 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.017.
  10. Chen C, Fuh J. Evaluating thunderclap headache. Curr Opin Neurol. Jun 1, 2021; 34: 356-362. 10.1097/wco.0000000000000917.
  11. Utukuri P, Shih R, Ajam A, Callahan K, Chen D et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Headache: 2022 Update. J Am Coll Radiol. 2023; 20: S70-S93. 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.02.018.
  12. Marcolini E, Hine J. Approach to the Diagnosis and Management of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. West J Emerg Med. 2019; 20: 203-211. 10.5811/westjem.2019.1.37352.
  13. Ledbetter L, Burns J, Shih R, Ajam A, Brown M et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Cerebrovascular Diseases-Aneurysm, Vascular Malformation, and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021; 18: S283-S304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.012.
  14. Thust S, Burke C, Siddiqui A. Neuroimaging findings in sickle cell disease. Br J Radiol. 2014; 87: 20130699. 10.1259/bjr.20130699.
  15. Robertson R, Palasis S, Rivkin M, Pruthi S, Bartel T et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Cerebrovascular Disease-Child. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020; 17: S36-S54. 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.01.036.
  16. Gonzalez N, Amin-Hanjani S, Bang O, Coffey C, Du R et al. Adult Moyamoya Disease and Syndrome: Current Perspectives and Future Directions: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2023; 54: e465-e479. 10.1161/STR.0000000000000443.
  17. Burton T, Bushnell C. Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome. Stroke. 2019; 50: 2253-2258. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.024416.
  1. Zuccoli G, Pipitone N, Haldipur A, Brown Jr R D, Hunder G. Imaging findings in primary central nervous system vasculitis. Clinical and experimental rheumatology. 2011; 29: S104-9.
  2. Godasi R, Pang G, Chauhan S, Bollu P. Primary Central Nervous System Vasculitis [Updated 2023]. StatPearls Publishing. 2023.
  3. Hofmann E, Behr R, Neumann-Haefelin T, Schwager K. Pulsatile tinnitus: imaging and differential diagnosis. Dtsch Arztebl Int. Jun 2013; 110: 451-8. 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0451.
  4. Pegge S, Steens S, Kunst H, Meijer F. Pulsatile Tinnitus: Differential Diagnosis and Radiological Work-Up. Curr Radiol Rep. 2017; 5: 5. 10.1007/s40134-017-0199-7.
  5. Davagnanam I, Fraser C L, Miszkiel K, Daniel C S, Plant G T. Adult Horners syndrome: a combined clinical, pharmacological, and imaging algorithm. Eye (London, England). 2013; 27: 291-8. 10.1038/eye.2012.281.
  6. Wingerchuk D, Banwell B, Bennett J, Cabre P, Carroll W et al. international consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology. Jul 14, 2015; 85: 177-89. 10.1212/wnl.0000000000001729.
  7. Wattjes M, Ciccarelli O, Reich D, Banwell B, de Stefano N et al. 2021 MAGNIMS-CMSC-NAIMS consensus recommendations on the use of MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. Aug 2021; 20: 653-670. 10.1016/s1474-4422(21)00095-8.
  8. Kaunzner U, Gauthier S. MRI in the assessment and monitoring of multiple sclerosis: an update on best practice. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. Jun 2017; 10: 247-261. 10.1177/1756285617708911.
  9. Radic J, Cochrane D. Choosing Wisely Canada: Pediatric Neurosurgery Recommendations. Paediatr Child Health. Sep 2018; 23: 383-387. 10.1093/pch/pxy012.
  10. Hatgaonkar A, Mahajan S, Hatgoankar K, Bandre G. MRI Insights in Chiari Malformation Type 1 and Variations With. Cureus. 2024; 16: e55676.
  11. Shah L, Salzman K. Imaging of spinal metastatic disease. Int J Surg Oncol. 2011; 2011: 769753. 10.1155/2011/769753.
  12. Ahmed A. MRI features of disseminated drop metastases. S Afr Med J. Jul 2008; 98: 522-3.
  13. Wang N, Bertalan M, Brastianos P. Leptomeningeal metastasis from systemic cancer: Review and update on management. Cancer. Jan 1, 2018; 124: 21-35. 10.1002/cncr.30911.
  14. Dhamija R, Plotkin S, Gomes A, et al. LZTR1- and SMARCB1-Related Schwannomatosis. Gene Reviews [Internet]. 2024.
  15. Pakalniskis M, Berg A, Policeni B, Gentry L, Sato Y et al. The Many Faces of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis: A Review of the Head and Neck Imaging Manifestations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Dec 2015; 205: W619-29. 10.2214/ajr.14.13864.
  16. Behbehani R. Clinical approach to optic neuropathies. Clin Ophthalmol. Sep 2007; 1: 233-46.
  17. Phuljhele S, Kedar S, Saxena R. Approach to optic neuritis: An update. Indian J Ophthalmol. Sep 2021; 69: 2266-2276. 10.4103/ijo.IJO_3415_20.
  18. Spillers N, Luther P, Talbot N, Kidder E, Doyle C et al. A Comparative Review of Typical and Atypical Optic Neuritis: Advancements in. Cureus. 2024; 16: e56094.
  19. Margolin E. The swollen optic nerve: an approach to diagnosis and management. Pract Neurol. Aug 2019; 19: 302-309. 10.1136/practneurol-2018-002057.
  20. Kaur K, Gurnani B, Devy N. Atypical optic neuritis - a case with a new surprise every visit. GMS Ophthalmol Cases. 2020; 10: Doc11. 10.3205/oc000138.
  1. de Graaf P, Göricke S, Rodjan F, Galluzzi P, Maeder P et al. Guidelines for imaging retinoblastoma: imaging principles and MRI standardization. Pediatr Radiol. Jan 2012; 42: 2-14. 10.1007/s00247-011-2201-5.
  2. Razek A, Elkhamary S. MRI of retinoblastoma. Br J Radiol. Sep 2011; 84: 775-84. 10.1259/bjr/32022497.
  3. Schaefer P, Miller J, Singhal A, Thrall J, Lee S. Headache: when is neurologic imaging indicated? J Am Coll Radiol. Aug 2007; 4: 566-9. 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.10.001.
  4. Wilbrink L, Ferrari M, Kruit M, Haan J. Neuroimaging in trigeminal autonomic cephalgias: when, how, and of what? Curr Opin Neurol. Jun 2009; 22: 247-53. 10.1097/wco.0b013e32832b4bb3.
  5. Jang Y, Cho E, Choi H, Kim S, Park H. Diagnostic Neuroimaging in Headache Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Psychiatry Investig. Jun 2019; 16: 407-417. 10.30773/pi.2019.04.11.
  6. Spierings E. Acute, subacute, and chronic headache. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. Dec 2003; 36: 1095-107, vi. 10.1016/s0030-6665(03)00128-2.
  7. Tyagi A. New daily persistent headache. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. Aug 2012; 15: S62-5. 10.4103/0972-2327.100011.
  8. Hadjikhani N, Vincent M. Neuroimaging clues of migraine aura. J Headache Pain. Apr 3, 2019; 20: 32. 10.1186/s10194-019-0983-2.
  9. Whitehead M, Cardenas A, Corey A, Policeni B, Burns J et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Headache. J Am Coll Radiol. Nov 2019; 16: S364-s377. 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.05.030.
  10. Andersen B, Miranda C, Hatzoglou V, DeAngelis L, Miller A. Leptomeningeal metastases in glioma: The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center experience. Neurology. May 21, 2019; 92: e2483-e2491. 10.1212/wnl.0000000000007529.
  11. Clarke J, Perez H, Jacks L, Panageas K, Deangelis L. Leptomeningeal metastases in the MRI era. Neurology. May 4, 2010; 74: 1449-54. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181dc1a69.
  12. Maillie L, Salgado L, Lazarev S. A systematic review of craniospinal irradiation for leptomeningeal disease: past, present, and future. Clin Transl Oncol. Oct 2021; 23: 2109-2119. 10.1007/s12094-021-02615-8.
  13. Smith R, Leonidas J, Maytal J. The value of head ultrasound in infants with macrocephaly. Pediatr Radiol. Mar 1998; 28: 143-6. 10.1007/s002470050315.
  14. Pindrik J, Ye X, Ji B, Pendleton C, Ahn E. Anterior fontanelle closure and size in full-term children based on head computed tomography. Clin Pediatr (Phila). Oct 2014; 53: 1149-57. 10.1177/0009922814538492.
  15. Geyer M, Nilssen E. Evidence-based management of a patient with anosmia. Clin Otolaryngol. Oct 2008; 33: 466-9. 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01819.x.
  16. Lechien J, Chiesa-Estomba C, De Siati D, Horoi M, Le Bon S et al. Olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions as a clinical presentation of mild-to-moderate forms of the coronavirus disease (COVID- 19): a multicenter European study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. Aug 2020; 277: 2251-2261. 10.1007/s00405-020-05965-1.
  17. Saniasiaya J, Islam M, Abdullah B. Prevalence of Olfactory Dysfunction in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Meta-analysis of 27,492 Patients. Laryngoscope. Apr 2021; 131: 865-878. 10.1002/lary.29286.
  18. Atluri S, Sarathi V, Goel A, Boppana R, Shivaprasad C. Etiological Profile of Galactorrhoea. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. Jul-Aug 2018; 22: 489-493. 10.4103/ijem.IJEM_89_18.
  1. Huang W, Molitch M. Evaluation and management of galactorrhea. Am Fam Physician. Jun 1, 2012; 85: 1073-80.
  2. Jensen R, Radojicic A, Yri H. The diagnosis and management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension and the associated headache. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. Jul 2016; 9: 317-26. 10.1177/1756285616635987.
  3. Connors J, Levy J. Thromboinflammation and the hypercoagulability of COVID-19. J Thromb Haemost. Jul 2020; 18: 1559-1561. 10.1111/jth.14849.
  4. Tu T, Goh C, Tan Y, Leow A, Pang Y et al. Cerebral Venous Thrombosis in Patients with COVID-19 Infection: A Case Series and Systematic Review. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. Dec 2020; 29: 105379. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105379.
  5. Coutinho J. Cerebral venous thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost. Jun 2015; 13 Suppl 1: S238-44. 10.1111/jth.12945.
  6. Ferro J, Canhão P, Aguiar de Sousa D. Cerebral venous thrombosis. Presse Med. Dec 2016; 45: e429-e450. 10.1016/j.lpm.2016.10.007.
  7. Lee M, Kim M. Image findings in brain developmental venous anomalies. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. Mar 2012; 14: 37-43. 10.7461/jcen.2012.14.1.37.
  8. van Beijnum J, van der Worp H, Algra A, Vandertop W, van den Berg R et al. Prevalence of brain arteriovenous malformations in first-degree relatives of patients with a brain arteriovenous malformation. Stroke. 2014; 45: 3231-5. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005442.
  9. Kernan W, Ovbiagele B, Black H, Bravata D, Chimowitz M et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014; 45: 2160-236. 10.1161/STR.0000000000000024.
  10. Wintermark M, Sanelli P, Albers G, Bello J, Derdeyn C et al. Imaging recommendations for acute stroke and transient ischemic attack patients: A joint statement by the American Society of Neuroradiology, the American College of Radiology, and the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013; 34: E117-27. 10.3174/ajnr.A3690.
  11. Chhetri S, Gow D, Shaunak S, Varma A. Clinical assessment of the sensory ataxias; diagnostic algorithm with illustrative cases. Pract Neurol. Aug 2014; 14: 242-51. 10.1136/practneurol-2013- 000764.
  12. Foster H, Drummond P, Jandial S, Clinch J , Wood M. Evaluation of gait disorders in children. BMJ Best Practice. February 23, 2021; 2023:
  13. Standford Medicine. Gait Abnormalities. 2023:
  14. Haynes K, Wimberly R, VanPelt J, Jo C, Riccio A. Toe Walking: A Neurological Perspective After Referral from Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons. J Pediatr Orthop. Mar 2018; 38: 152-156. 10.1097/bpo.0000000000001115.
  15. Marshall F. Approach to the elderly patient with gait disturbance. Neurol Clin Pract. Jun 2012; 2: 103-111. 10.1212/CPJ.0b013e31825a7823.
  16. Pirker W, Katzenschlager R. Gait disorders in adults and the elderly: A clinical guide. Wien Klin Wochenschr. Feb 2017; 129: 81-95. 10.1007/s00508-016-1096-4.

Coding Section 

Code Number Description
CPT 70540 Magnetic resonance (e.g., proton) imaging, orbit, face, and/or neck; without contrast material(s)
  70542 Magnetic resonance (e.g., proton) imaging, orbit, face, and/or neck; with contrast material(s)
  70543 Magnetic resonance (e.g., proton) imaging, orbit, face, and/or neck; without contrast material(s), followed by contrast material(s) and further sequences
  70551 Magnetic resonance (e.g., proton) imaging, brain (including brain stem); without contrast material
  70552 Magnetic resonance (e.g., proton) imaging, brain (including brain stem); with contrast material(s)
  70553 Magnetic resonance (e.g., proton) imaging, brain (including brain stem); without contrast material, followed by contrast material(s) and further sequences
  0698T

Quantitative magnetic resonance for analysis of tissue composition (eg, fat, iron, water content), including multiparametric data acquisition, data preparation and transmission, interpretation and report, obtained without diagnostic mri examination of the same anatomy (eg, organ, gland, tissue, target structure) during the same session; multiple organs (list separately in addition to code for  primary procedure)                                                           

Procedure and diagnosis codes on Medical Policy documents are included only as a general reference tool for each policy. They may not be all-inclusive. 

This medical policy was developed through consideration of peer-reviewed medical literature generally recognized by the relevant medical community, U.S. FDA approval status, nationally accepted standards of medical practice and accepted standards of medical practice in this community, and other nonaffiliated technology evaluation centers, reference to federal regulations, other plan medical policies, and accredited national guidelines.

"Current Procedural Terminology © American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved" 

History From 2019 Forward     

12/01/2024 Annual review, policy updated for clarity and consistency. Adding - Genetic syndromes and rare disease section- reorganized indications - Note: Vessel wall MRI (ordered as Brain MRI) can also be performed in the evaluation of vasculitides - PML suspected or known to the infectious or inflammatory disease section. - And updated Brain MRI for Known Cancer sections (initial staging, restaging and surveillance) - Vertigo with progressive unilateral hearing loss or tinnitus Horner’s syndrome with symptoms localizing the lesion to the central nervous system (Brain/Cervical MRI Combo) - Known Moyamoya disease or eversible cerebral vasoconstriction with any new or changing neurological signs or symptoms (also to (Brain MRA /MRI combo) - Suspected secondary CNS vasculitis based on neurological signs or symptoms in the setting of an underlying systemic disease with abnormal inflammatory markers or autoimmune antibodies (Brain MRA /MRI combo) - Suspected primary CNS vasculitis based on neurological signs and symptoms with completed infectious/inflammatory lab work-up ((Brain MRA /MRI combo)) - Giant cell arteritis with suspected intracranial and extracranial involvement (Brain MRA /Neck/ Brain MRI combo)) Clarified - Updated pediatric seizure section. - Treatment of Alzheimer's disease with anti-amyloid-β monoclonal antibodies - baseline and surveillance imaging as per FDA labeling. Also updating description, references and combination section. Adding purpose
12/01/2023 Annual review, no change to policy intent. Updating entire policy for consistency. Coding updated.
12/20/2022 Annual review, multiple updates to coverage area.

12/07/2021 

Annual review, multiple policy revisions, additions and deletions. Policy criteria reorganized, description and references updated. 

11/01/2020 

Annual review, policy updated with numerous additions, revisions and clarifications. Also updating background and references. 

12/02/2019

New Policy

Complementary Content
${loading}